<div>Dear list members</div> Instead direct cooling with steam , it is posible use indirect cooling later use hudrogen rich methane recycle gqs reducing steam consumption!There are several patents to make the process simple <br>
<br><div>Pannirselvam P V</div><div>BRAZIL<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Jim Leach <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jleach@danatech.net">jleach@danatech.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" bgcolor="white" vlink="purple">
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial">Thanks Florian,</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial">If one wants to burn the product gas in an engine or a gas
turbine you have to cool and clean the gas anyway. So dropping the
temperature would be a part of the tar removal process and would occur
anyway. Adding water is not good because the product gas must be well
below the dew point for the combustion device. So it you put it in
for methanation, you will have to take it out later. But what I was interested
in was simply converting the H2 to CH4, because engines (including GT's) don't
really like H2 (it burns too fast). Reciprocating engines in particular,
would much prefer a steady diet of CH4. But I think I understand from your
answer is that it is not worth it. Unfortunately, an answer I was
expecting.</font></span></div><div class="im">
<div><font color="#0000ff" size="2" face="Arial"></font> </div>
<div align="left"><font color="#04c6db" face="Arial"><strong>JAMES T. LEACH,
P.E.</strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font color="#04c6db" size="2" face="Arial"><strong>President</strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><strong><font color="#04c6db" size="2" face="Arial"></font></strong> </div>
<div align="left"><font color="#23c2cf" face="Arial"><strong><em>DANA TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.</em></strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font color="#23c2cf" size="2" face="Arial"><strong><em>32242 Paseo
Adelanto, Suite D</em></strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font color="#23c2cf" size="2" face="Arial"><strong><em>San Juan
Capistrano, CA 92675</em></strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font color="#23c2cf" size="2" face="Arial"><strong><em>Ph
949-496-6516</em></strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font color="#23c2cf" size="2" face="Arial"><strong><em>Fx
949-496-8133</em></strong></font></div>
<div align="left"><font color="#23c2cf" size="2" face="Arial"><strong><em>Mobile
949-933-6518</em></strong></font></div>
<div> </div><br>
</div><div dir="ltr" lang="en-us" align="left">
<hr>
<font size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b>
<a href="mailto:gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of
</b>Florian Nagel<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:52 PM<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><b>To:</b>
'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re:
[Gasification] back to gasification<br></div></div></font><br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<div></div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">Hi
James</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">I
cant comment on the cost of the methanation step but I can comment on your idea
regarding a methanation step as fuel upgrade in a gasification- and gas
engine-based power plant. I did my thesis together with Jan at PSI working on
the combination of high-temperature fuel cells with woody biomass gasifiers: <a href="http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/view/eth:41553" target="_blank">http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/view/eth:41553</a>
. Hi Jan, I m still on that list as you see :D</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">Methanation
is an exothermic process that yields the highest methane concentration in the
product gas when kept around 400C process temperature. Hence, you ll first have
to cool your syngas down to 400C. Depending on your gasifier type and syngas
composition, you might get into carbon deposition problems (Boudouard reaction
for example where 2 CO molecules decompose into carbon and carbon dioxide). You
can overcome these problems by injecting steam into your syngas (which will cool
it down at the same time..) which you will also need to increase your hydrogen
atom content in a way that allows methanation. Then you can take it from there
and produce methane.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">Problem
I see is that by introducing water into your fuel gas, you already lower its
heating value. This results in a lower combustion temperature in your gas
engine. Gas engines are limited by the Carnot efficiency rule that clearly
states that the efficiency of a combustion engine increases with the difference
between the temperature of the hot compressed combusted gas and the temperature
of the expanded exhaust gas. Hence, the efficiency of a combustion engine
running on humidized syngas should definitely be lower than running on
unhumidified syngas. Next problem is, during the methanation you have to cool
the reactor. Thus you are again reducing the energy content of your syngas or by
that time synthetic methane (relative to the energy content of the initial
feedstock). The energy you extract from the methanation process is in form of
low-temperature heat (400C) which you can hardly use economically to produce
electricity with a steam cycle. Once you have your synthetic methane gas
mixture, you ll have to reduce the high water content of it to not run into
above mentioned efficiency issues of the combustion engine. This can only be
done by cooling the gas close to ambient temperature were the water simply
condenses. Another point in the process were you extract energy at very very low
temperature level. I would consider this energy as a complete loss. From there
you can use the dried, cold synthetic methane in your engine and produce
electricity.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">To
put it in numbers: Good gasification-gas engine plants reach efficiencies around
25 to 30% without bottoming-cycle (steam cycle to use exhaust heat). The
methanation process has an efficiency around 65%. Together with a very high
combustion engine efficiency of 42.5%, you end up with a maximum efficiency of a
gasification-methanation-gas engine scheme of around 27.5%. However, with
considerably higher equipment cost. I definitely recommend not to use a
methanation step as fuel upgrading step but to use the syngas directly in your
engine. In any case, the world totally changes if you aim at using
high-temperature fuel cells, gas turbines or if you want to make the wood energy
transportable and storable. The latter was the idea of the PSI methanation
project given Switzerlands dependence on foreign gas
imports.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">Cheers</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt">Florian
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1f497d;font-size:11pt"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border-bottom:medium none;border-left:medium none;padding-bottom:0in;padding-left:0in;padding-right:0in;border-top:#b5c4df 1pt solid;border-right:medium none;padding-top:3pt">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt">
<a href="mailto:gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Jim
Leach<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 01, 2011 15:51<br><b>To:</b> 'Discussion
of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Gasification]
back to gasification</span></p></div></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>Jan,</span></span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>I am curious what method you
selected for tar removal. Also, was the methanation step expensive?
The methane would make a better engine fuel than the H2 and CO but I am
concerned about the cost.</span></span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>Best Regards,</span></span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="color:#04c6db;font-size:9pt">JAMES
T. LEACH, P.E.</span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="color:#04c6db;font-size:10pt">President</span></strong><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><b><span style="color:#23c2cf;font-size:9pt">DANA
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.</span></b></em><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><b><span style="color:#23c2cf;font-size:10pt">32242
Paseo Adelanto, Suite D</span></b></em><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><b><span style="color:#23c2cf;font-size:10pt">San
Juan Capistrano, CA 92675</span></b></em><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><b><span style="color:#23c2cf;font-size:10pt">Ph
949-496-6516</span></b></em><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><b><span style="color:#23c2cf;font-size:10pt">Fx
949-496-8133</span></b></em><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><b><span style="color:#23c2cf;font-size:10pt">Mobile
949-933-6518</span></b></em><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p>
<div style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-size:9pt">
<hr align="center" size="3" width="100%">
</span></div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt">
<a href="mailto:gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Jan
Kopyscinski<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:13 PM<br><b>To:</b>
Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification<br><b>Subject:</b> Re:
[Gasification] back to gasification</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">Hi Kevin,<br><br>I
did my Phd thesis on this topic. You can find more information there:<br><a href="http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/view/eth:1059" target="_blank">http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/view/eth:1059</a><br><br>or
under <a href="http://www.bio-sng.com" target="_blank">www.bio-sng.com</a> and <a href="http://www.biosng.com" target="_blank">www.biosng.com</a>, <a href="http://www.biofuelstp.eu/bio-sng.html" target="_blank">http://www.biofuelstp.eu/bio-sng.html</a>
and on other pages.<br><br>In a nut shell the process consits of:<br>1)
low temperature steam gasification<br>2) gas cleaning (ash, tar, H2S, ...)<br>3)
methanation = conversion of the syngas into methan (catalytic process, mostly
Nickelcatalyst)<br> CO + 3 H2 --> CH4 + H2O<br> CO + H2O --> H2
+ CO2<br><br>If you use a different catalyst you can go for higher hydrocarbon
such as Fischer Tropsch Diesel, or Methanol, ....<br><br>4) Fuel upgrading =
removal of H2O, CO2<br><br>We at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland (<a href="http://tpe.web.psi.ch/" target="_blank">http://tpe.web.psi.ch/</a>) investigated this
process from wood to BioSNG in two scales for more than
1000h.<br><br>Regards<br><br>Jan</span></p><pre>- </pre><pre>Dr. sc. Jan Kopyscinski</pre><pre>Postdoctoral fellow</pre><pre>Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering</pre><pre>Schulich School of Engineering</pre>
<pre>University of Calgary</pre><pre>2500 University Drive NW</pre><pre>Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4</pre><pre> </pre><pre>Email: <a href="mailto:jan.kopyscinski@ucalgary.ca" target="_blank">jan.kopyscinski@ucalgary.ca</a></pre>
<pre>Phone: 001 403 2109575 </pre>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"><br><br><br><br></span></p>
<div style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-size:9pt">
<hr align="center" size="3" width="100%">
</span></div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:9pt">Von:</span></b><span style="font-size:9pt"> Kevin
<<a href="mailto:kchisholm@ca.inter.net" target="_blank">kchisholm@ca.inter.net</a>><br><b>Gesendet:</b> May 31, 2011 5:02:24
PM<br><b>An:</b> "Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification"
<<a href="mailto:gasification@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>><br><b>Betreff:</b> Re:
[Gasification] back to gasification</span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Dear Jan</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Very
interesting!!</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">What steam
temperature and pressure is required to gasify wood?</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Once one has such
gas, what sort processing is required to convert it to CH4? (That is, what
temperatures, pressures, catalysts, etc)</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Is there any way this
can be done on a small scale?</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Is there any way this
process can be modified to produce methanol on a small scale? If so, this would
be awesome... it would then yield a very portable liquid fuel.</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Thanks!</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">Kevin</span><span style="font-size:9pt"></span></p></div>
<blockquote style="border-bottom:medium none;border-left:black 1.5pt solid;padding-bottom:0in;margin:5pt 0in 5pt 3.75pt;padding-left:4pt;padding-right:0in;border-top:medium none;border-right:medium none;padding-top:0in">
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt">----- Original
Message -----</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:#e4e4e4" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt"> <a title="jan.kopy@web.de" href="mailto:jan.kopy@web.de" target="_blank">Jan
Kopyscinski</a></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt">To:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt"> <a title="gasification@lists.bioenergylists.org" href="mailto:gasification@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">Discussion of biomass
pyrolysis and gasification</a></span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt">Sent:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt"> Tuesday, May 31,
2011 11:30 AM</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10pt">Subject:</span></b><span style="font-size:10pt"> Re: [Gasification]
back to gasification</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt;background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"><br>Hi,<br><br>First
of all, there are at least two different types of biofuel:<br>First
Generation: agricultural feedstock, which is converted by means of
biochemical processes (i.e., digestion) --> Biogas<br>Second Generation:
woody biomass that is converted via thermochemical converiosn into a producer
or so-calles syngas (Gasification).<br>Thus, if your goal is to produce Methan
or Natural Gas substite for a gas engine or transportation fuel you have
different options. But you need to know what is your feedstock (dry , wet,
digestable or not digestable such as wood):<br>If you have a rather dry
feedstock you can go for steam gasifiaction (no air, means no Nitrogen). The
produced syngas you can catalytilcally convert to CH4, CO2 and H2O. Prior to
the methanation process you need to remove the sulphur since it is
deactivating your catalyts. H2O and CO2 can then be removed. This process has
been investiaget by the Paul Scherrer Institiute in Switzerland (<a href="http://www.psi.ch" target="_blank">www.psi.ch</a> and <a href="http://www.bio-sng.com" target="_blank">www.bio-sng.com</a>).<br>Removal of nitrogen is
too expensive, thus you should avoid feeding it into your process. 2 vol% to
max 5vol% N2 in the methan rich gas is
acceptable.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Jan</span></p>
<div style="text-align:center;background:white" class="MsoNormal" align="center"><span style="font-size:9pt">
<hr align="center" size="3" width="100%">
</span></div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:9pt">Von:</span></b><span style="font-size:9pt"> "Pannirselvam
P.V" <<a href="mailto:pannirbr@gmail.com" target="_blank">pannirbr@gmail.com</a>><br><b>Gesendet:</b> May 31, 2011 12:46:54
PM<br><b>An:</b> "Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification"
<<a href="mailto:gasification@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">gasification@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>><br><b>Betreff:</b> Re:
[Gasification] back to gasification<br><br>Dear A.D Karve
</span></p>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">
One of the project we have been studying is based on the
IGT,Instuite Gas technology patented process called Biotherm
, in which the wood gas or syngqs can be passed into the
biodigestor, in which CO and Hydrogen can be converted into
methane ; the NOX .COX, SOX removed via simple known wet or
dry process using activated charcoal and lime ; the methane is
then compressed.The N can be removed as ammonia,as this can be
very toxic to bio methane bacteria; Syngas obtained via pyrogas can reduce
this N2 problem and complexity.Thus pyrogas technology has more
potential than wood gas technology</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> we are
studying how to make this complex process into simple innovative process to
make possible charcoal and methane economy which is practiced
in the developed country in big scale can be made
possible in developing village level technology too in small scale ,The
project is yet in design stage to reduce CO2 to use as liquid
fertilizer too increasing the
calorific valued the compressed biogas.</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">Yours
truely</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">Pannirselvam</span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p></div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom:12pt;background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt"> </span></p>
<div>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">On Mon, May 30,
2011 at 11:01 PM, Anand Karve <<a href="mailto:adkarve@gmail.com" target="_blank">adkarve@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:</span></p>
<p style="background:white" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">Dear List,<br>We
are already using, in India, wood gas made from agricultural waste<br>to run
stationary internal combustion engines. But, for using it as<br>automobile
fuel, it would have to be filled into cylinders, for which<br>the nitrogen in
the wood gas would have to be removed in order to<br>reduce its bulk and to
increase its calorfiic value. Does anybody have<br>a suggestion as to how this
can be
achieved?<br>Yours<br>A.D.Karve<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Gasification
mailing list<br><br>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br><a href="mailto:Gasification@bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">Gasification@bioenergylists.org</a><br><br>to
UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page<br><a href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
<br>for
more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:<br><a href="http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/" target="_blank">http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/</a></span></p></div></div></blockquote></div><p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-size:9pt"><br>__________
Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6172
(20110601) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET NOD32
Antivirus.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com" target="_blank">http://www.eset.com</a></span></p></div><br><br>__________
Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6172
(20110601) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET NOD32
Antivirus.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com" target="_blank">http://www.eset.com</a><br><br><br>__________
Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6172
(20110601) __________<br><br>The message was checked by ESET NOD32
Antivirus.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com" target="_blank">http://www.eset.com</a><br> <br><br>__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6172 (20110601) __________<br><br>
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.<br><br><a href="http://www.eset.com" target="_blank">http://www.eset.com</a><br> </div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Gasification mailing list<br>
<br>
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br>
<a href="mailto:Gasification@bioenergylists.org">Gasification@bioenergylists.org</a><br>
<br>
to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page<br>
<a href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
<br>
for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:<br>
<a href="http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/" target="_blank">http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org/</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>************************************************<br>P.V.PANNIRSELVAM<br>ASSOCIATE . PROF.<br>Research Group ,GPEC, Coordinator <br>Computer aided Cost engineering<br>
<br>DEQ – Departamento de Engenharia Química<br>CT – Centro de Tecnologia / UFRN, Lagoa Nova – Natal/RN<br>Campus Universitário. CEP: 59.072-970<br>North East,Brazil<br>*******************************************<br><a href="https://sites.google.com/a/biomassa.eq.ufrn.br/sites/">https://sites.google.com/a/biomassa.eq.ufrn.br/sites/</a><br>
and <br><a href="http://ecosyseng.wetpaint.com/">http://ecosyseng.wetpaint.com/</a><br><br><br>Fone ;Office<br>84 3215-3769 , Ramal 210<br>Home : 84 3217-1557<br><br>Mobile :558488145083<br><br>Email:<br><a href="mailto:pvpa@msn.com">pvpa@msn.com</a><br>
<a href="mailto:panruti2002@yahoo.com">panruti2002@yahoo.com</a><br><a href="mailto:pannirbr@gmail.com">pannirbr@gmail.com</a><br><a href="mailto:pvpa@msn.com">pvpa@msn.com</a><br><br><br><br>
</div>