[Greenbuilding] PV Tracking ~ Fibonacci?

[Reuben Deumling]

Nick,

here's a fellow how is inclined to agree with you.

---------- Forwarded message ----------

I came across this story and then was directed to this post -
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JmlMNqVPKlsJ:uvdiv.blogspot.com/2011/08/solar-panel-trees-really-are-inferior.html+http://uvdiv.blogspot.com/2011/08/solar-panel-trees-really-are-inferior.html&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com

It apparently disproves what the 13 year old is said to have found. I will
leave it to those who wish to work through the math and physics to say which
is true.



On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, nick pine <nick at early.com> wrote:

> The tree design made 20% more electricity and collected 2 1/2 more hours of
> sunlight during the day.
>
> The text and graphs have no evidence to support those claims.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20110821/b2d54595/attachment.html>