[Greenbuilding] Solar air heater efficiency vs absorber area and airflow

Clarke Olsen colsen at fairpoint.net
Sat Feb 19 14:32:44 CST 2011


    I built an air-cooled wall collector where the incoming air went  
up between the absorber panel
and the glazing, over the top and down the back, for a double wash of  
the absorber.
We used aluminum roof panels and Rustoleum Barbecue Paint, flattened  
with a little wood ash.
    Would collection be improved by making the spacing asymmetrical;  
that is, making the air go faster
on one side (glass side?) of the plate?
Clarke Olsen
373 route 203
Spencertown, NY 12165
USA
518-392-4640
colsen at fairpoint.net




On Feb 19, 2011, at 12:31 PM, nick pine wrote:

> Modeling an air heater with R1 single glazing with a nominal R2/3
> inside air film resistance and an R1/3 outdoor film and 90% solar
> transmission in 250 Btu/h-ft^2 sun on a 30 F day with 70 F inlet air
> in a fixed font (can we fix this group to allow that?)...
>
>   225 Btu/h
>      ---   Tp  Ra/AP  Ta   1/cfm
> |---|-->|-------www---------www--- 70 F
>      ---    |         |    ----->
>             |         |     Uhg
>          I| w      I| w
>          g| w Rr   g| w Ra
>          r| w      c| w
>           v |       v |
>             |         |     1/3
>              ---------------www--- 30 F
>                       Tg   ----->
>                             Iga
>
> Assuming Tg = 70 F to start makes the glazing loss to outdoor air
> Iga = (70-30)3 = 120 Btu/h, which makes the useful heat gain
> Uhg = 225-120 = 105 Btu/h, which makes the air temp Ta = 70+105/10
> = 80.5 F with 10 cfm of airflow, which makes the convective glazing
> gain Igc = (80.5-60)/R2/3 = 30.8 Btu/h, approximately, which makes
> the absorber plate temp Tp = 80.5+(30.8+105)/R2/3/1ft^2 = 284 F, with
> 1ft^2 of plate area, which makes the average absolute plate-glazing
> temp Tavg = 460+(284+60)/2 = 632 R, which makes the linearized
> plate-glazing radiation resistance Rr = 1/(4x1.714E-9x632^3)
> = 0.58 ft^2-F-h/Btu, which makes the radiative glazing heat gain
> Igr = (284-60)/0.58 = 388 Btu/h (wow), which makes Tg = 0.9x70
> +0.1(30+(388+30.8)/3) = 80 F, and so on...
>
> 10 D=6/12'collector depth (feet)
> 20 FOR AP = 1 TO 5'absorber plate area (ft^2)
> 30 FOR CFM=5 TO 20 STEP 5'collector airflow
> 40 V=CFM/D/88'air velocity (mph)
> 50 RA=1/(1.5+V/5)'airfilm resistance (ft^2-F-h/Btu)
> 60 TG=60'initial glazing temp (F)
> 70 FOR I=1 TO 100'relaxation iterations
> 80 IGA=(TG-30)*3'glazing loss (Btu/h)
> 90 UHG=225-IGA'useful heat gain (Btu/h)
> 100 TA=70+UHG/CFM'collector air temp (F)
> 110 IGC=(TA-TG)/RA'convective glazing gain
> 120 TP=TA+(IGC+UHG)*RA/AP'plate temp (F)
> 130 TAVG=460+(TP+TG)/2'average plate-glazing temp (R)
> 140 RR=1/(4*1.714E-09*TAVG^3)'radiation resistance
> 150 IGR=(TP-TG)/RR'radiative glazing gain (Btu/h)
> 160 TG=.9*TG+.1*(30+(IGR+IGC)/3)'new glazing temp (F)
> 170 NEXT
> 180 EFF=100*UHG/250'efficiency
> 190 PRINT 1000*AP+CFM;"'";TG,TA,TP,EFF
> 200 NEXT CFM
> 210 NEXT AP
>
> AP  cfm   Tg (F)     Ta (F)     Tp (F)      Efficiency
>
> 1   05    74.78818   88.12709   160.9878    36.25419%
> 1   10    71.01676   80.19498   155.3407    40.7799
> 1   15    69.4577    77.10846   152.7532    42.65077
> 1   20    68.55936   75.4661    151.0895    43.72877
>
> 2   05    69.2611    91.44334   137.74      42.88668
> 2   10    64.71699   82.0849    129.8671    48.33962
> 2   15    62.89892   78.42022   126.4515    50.5213
> 2   20    61.89681   76.46548   124.39      51.72383
>
> 3   05    66.82973   92.90216   126.66      45.80433
> 3   10    61.9705    82.90885   117.7309    51.63541
> 3   15    60.05735   78.98853   113.958     53.93118
> 3   20    59.02503   76.89625   111.7519    55.16997
>
> 4   05    65.47826   93.71304   120.2377    47.4261
> 4   10    60.45372   83.36388   110.7095    53.45554
> 4   15    58.49396   79.30121   106.745     55.80725
> 4   20    57.44931   77.13261   104.4702    57.06084
>
> 5   05    64.62126   94.22724   116.0589    48.45449
> 5   10    59.4962    83.65114   106.1483    54.60457
> 5   15    57.50936   79.49813   102.0662    56.98878
> 5   20    56.45863   77.28121   99.75274    58.24965
>
> The glazing and plate temps fall and solar collection
> efficiency rises with more plate area and airflow.
>
> A mesh plate can further improve efficiency
> by keeping cooler inlet air near the glazing and
> blocking some radiation from a back wall to the glazing.
>
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
> greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20110219/33f05046/attachment.html>


More information about the Greenbuilding mailing list