[Greenbuilding] energy and power terms
RT
Archilogic at yahoo.ca
Mon Nov 21 11:04:57 CST 2011
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:04:08 -0500, Alan Abrams
<alan at abramsdesignbuild.com> wrote:
> methinks that what is problematical is semantical.
> if these terms are logical and intuitive--then
> watts should logically be the term for the volume of electricity
> consumed, and watts per hours should be the term for the rate.
>
> but it's not. hence the confusion.
I feel like that old Italian grandfather in the movie "Moonstruck" who,
seated at the dinner (or breakfast ?) table and confronted with what he
thought were a number of illicit affairs going on amongst the gathered,
moaned while holding his head
"I'm very confooosed !!!"
I remember from my Grade 10 high school "Electricity" class:
Power (P) = voltage (E) x current (I), expressed in the units "Watts".
If one flicks the light switch to power "on" a 1000 watt light bulb and
leave that switch in the "ON" position for 23 hours then the electricity
consumed during that period is:
1000 Watts x 23 hours = 2300 Watt * hours = 2.3 kiloWatt* hours (or
2.3 kW-hrs)
... and not "2300 watts per hours" (ie 2300 watts/hrs) as AA-Man logic &
intuition would suggest.
Eh what ?
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at Y a h o o dot c a >
(manually winnow the chaff from my edress if you hit "reply")
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list