[Greenbuilding] Green Funerals
RT
Archilogic at yahoo.ca
Thu Feb 2 15:41:47 CST 2012
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:48:44 -0500, Clarke Olsen <colsen at fairpoint.net>
wrote:
> Sky burial: the corpse is left on a platform for the birds, out of reach
> from those predators who might acquire
> an appetite for Long Pig, and out of sight for the squeamish.
Geeze, I knew that I shouldn't have opened my GB list mail in the middle
of a weekday afternoon.
I wasn't going to comment on the postings to the "Green Funerals" thread
until some day when the List is quiet but Clarke sucker-baited me with
this one.
While I like the idea of sky burials (moreso than the Two Steves ideas of
chopping up our loved ones into little pieces and using them for animal
feed), there's still the issue of what to do with the bones once they have
been picked clean by the scavengers.
There is an old Chinese practise that is somewhat similar to sky burials
where the corpse is buried temporarily for three years and then exhumed
after decomposition of the soft tissue has been completed and the bones
are cleaned and transferred to an urn for permanent storage.
But back to the idea of sky burials or Steve S's advocated Masai practise
of leaving the corpse just outside of the village for animals to eat...
I remember a couple of winters ago when taking the mutts out for their
romps in the surrounding coutryside, whenever we got near to a particular
woods they'd disappear into the same area every day and not come out again
until repeated call-back commands were issued.
One day instead of calling them back, I went into the woods and tracked
them down.
It turns out that they had a deer carcase (presumably injured by a car and
had gone into the woods to die) that they had been snacking on, nicely
refrigerated by the Kanata winter so that the meat was as fresh and
colourful as the day the deer died.
It took them a good two weeks to finish it off IIRC.
I can imagine a pet owner out for a walk with their kids and pets in the
country on a Sunday afternoon and going looking for a pet who was ingoring
their call-back commands and then coming upon a grisly scene of Muffy
snacking on the corpse of a recently passed-way neighbour or friend or
relative. Ggggnnna-aa.
Nope. I think burial is a better option.
Another person suggested that burial was "unsustainable" because it takes
up so much space.
OTOH, an argument could be made that cemeteries create invaluable
greenspace in urban areas, the vegetation helping to clean and filter the
polluted city air.
Combining this notion with Mike O's idea of land trusts...
What if everywhere a body is buried, a tree is planted directly over the
corpse ? In urban areas, there's no reason why boulevards could not be
provided on every street for this purpose. As with cemeteries, that area
would be considered "sacred ground" and by Law, could not be disturbed, in
perpetuity.
Of course, like Masai animal feeding-burials and First Nations Peoples'
sky burials, Sacred Boulevards would never happen in North America.
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at Y a h o o dot c a >
(manually winnow the chaff from my edress if you hit "reply")
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list