[Greenbuilding] 100 miles builds
Corwyn
corwyn at midcoast.com
Sun Feb 26 09:13:05 CST 2012
On 2/25/2012 10:14 PM, Jason Holstine wrote:
> Id argue that's overly generalist and not necessarily true. (a) better they rebuild at
net zero than trash, but putting that aside... The old home may have
been a creaky sieve
with asbestos and lead paint hanging out. How healthy and responsible
is that?
The asbestos and lead paint are a bit of red herring. They are often
best left undisturbed, and eventually they will need to be dealt with no
matter what you do.
But the issue of sieves is pertinent now. A house which is consuming
vast amounts of fossil fuels is not green. It is an intriguing question
when you are better off starting over rather than renovating what you
have. I am involved with a couple of projects to retrofit existing
houses to Passivhaus standards. While it certainly isn't as easy to
accomplish as building from scratch, it is a lot less material
intensive. I am not seeing much of a correlation between the current
efficiency or age of an existing building, and the ease of retrofitting
it to be energy efficient. Some of the easiest buildings are early
1800's mansions with thick empty walls, while others are cheaply made
buildings that just get wrapped.
I think we are once again, needing to examine the details of each case,
and doing the right thing based on an intelligent analysis of all
possibilities.
Thank You Kindly,
Corwyn
--
Topher Belknap
Green Fret Consulting
Kermit didn't know the half of it...
http://www.greenfret.com/
topher at greenfret.com
(207) 882-7652
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list