[Greenbuilding] Passive solar home--concrete overlay re thermalmass
RT
archilogic at yahoo.ca
Tue May 14 10:16:59 CDT 2013
On Tue, 14 May 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Alan Abrams
<alan at abramsdesignbuild.com> wrote:
> 1. I assumed the slab was [snip]
And I think that nails the biggest problem in this thread -- not enough
information provided by the OP.
I haven't read all of the postings to this thread but in what I did read,
I didn't see anything about specifically what it is about the slab that
(in the OP's opinion ) justifies it being demolished and replaced at the
contractor (or sub-contractor's ?) expense.
It's entirely possible that the shortcomings (the nature of which is an
unknown at this point (to me anyway) are due to poor (or just plain bad)
design/specifications.
In order to make any sort of reasonable assessment of the situation (short
of a site visit) I think that one would need:
(1) cross section of the floor (ie including everything in the supporting
substrate .... if wood framed, that would mean joist size/spacing/span,
sub-floor material/thickness, separation membrane, concrete mix used,
primary & secondary reinforcement details, some idea of concrete
placing/finishing/curing process followed, control joint spacing
... blah,blah blah.
Without that info, we're just taking pot shots in the dark.
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom AOD257
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at Y a h o o dot c a >
(manually winnow the chaff from my edress if you hit "reply")
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list