[Greenbuilding] embodied energy was Polyiso strength on roof

[ErgoDesk]

Ok you got me on this one, besides I'm busy trying to save the world, but
if you want to waste time nickel and dimming yourselves on the constant
changing numbers here they are. http://goo.gl/FMnYUz

-enjoy the info, just warning you upfront

http://about.me/StyroHome


On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:33 AM, JOHN SALMEN <terrain at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Except the density thing and the economic  politics that don't set
> recycling requirements for paper in na
> Realistically cellulose insul is like 3%? Of insul  sakes. If that ‎ rose
> it would be more forests
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>   *From: *Alan Abrams
> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 09:35
> *To: *listserv Green Building new
> *Reply To: *Green Building
> *Subject: *Re: [Greenbuilding] embodied energy was Polyiso strength on
> roof
>
> John...assuming your assessment is accurate, and that any batch of
> cellulose has had at least one go-round as Krauthammer columns, then
> shouldn't the EE value be halved? If so, then it's still high, but more
> competitive against EPS.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20141209/352e7b64/attachment.html>