[Greenbuilding] Windows

[Michael O'Brien]

Hi, guys--

Do buyers evaluate replacing windows solely on payback? There are so many different window amenities and features that each buyer weights differently (but collectively). Easier hardware, better visibility, solar glass, less maintenance--and many more. For example I did not want any PVC in my house so paid for fiberglass frames. Not saying that should be your choice, just an example of a reason other than payback.

Best, Mike
Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 21, 2015, at 7:25 PM, Gennaro Brooks-Church - Eco Brooklyn <info at ecobrooklyn.com> wrote:
> 
> is this true?:
> You'll NEVER save money with replacement windows. There is no return on investment EVER because it would take a minimum of 40 yrs to see a return and no replacement window would last that long before needing replaced again. The data is out there. There have been thermal imaging studies done on the efficiency of original windows and on opening both sashes for air condition. Very efficient. With a minimal amount of work, any home owner can restore original windows, for cheaper than the cost of replacement, and have a much higher quality window that will last another 100 yrs."
> 
> 
> -- 
> Gennaro Brooks-Church
> Director, Eco Brooklyn Inc.
> Cell: 1 347 244 3016 USA
> www.EcoBrooklyn.com
> 22 2nd St; Brooklyn, NY 11231
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20150922/0d393861/attachment.html>