[Greenbuilding] Earthquakes and older houses

Bob Waldrop bwaldrop1952 at att.net
Wed Mar 30 14:52:56 CDT 2016


Thanks everyone for these detailed comments and suggestions. There's a 
lot to take in, I'm printing the emails and will share them around a bit 
and see about coming up with a plan of action. One "low hanging fruit" 
item we're taking care of this week is making sure that nothing 
furnishing-like can fall on us while in bed or casually sitting around.  
This involves re-siting some large mirrors, paintings, and book cases.

Bob Waldrop, Okie City

On 3/30/2016 8:32 AM, Alan Abrams wrote:
> Bob--
>
> imagining the Oklahoma version of "The Big One," I think the gravest 
> danger is the collapse of the brick foundation walls. in our 
> region,bricks from the 20's can be pretty soft, and the mortar can be 
> powdery.
>
> if that all describes the scenario, simply anchoring the floor system 
> to the top of the brick walls might be inadequate. the strength of the 
> foundation walls would be limited to the compressive force exerted by 
> the weight of the house above. in this sense, the weight of the brick 
> veneer is your friend--but I think the veneer is going to be the first 
> element to fail when things start to shake. The point being, that even 
> if the floor is anchored, the foundation walls could rotate in, 
> between corners.
>
> one could of course jack up the house and install a new reinforced cmu 
> or poured concrete foundation beneath it. Or form up and pour new 
> walls against the existing walls.
>
> but less intrusively, one might strengthen the walls by increasing the 
> compressive force--perhaps by excavating and installing a set of pier 
> footings at intervals around the basement perimeter, each pier footing 
> undermining the existing footing--maybe 2' wide or so. each pier would 
> have a reinforced anchor bolt, to fasten some set of threaded rods and 
> turnbuckles--which in turn would be bolted to the floor joists. 
> Ideally, there would be two rods for each pier footing, run diagonally 
> in opposite directions, parallel to the foundation walls.
>
> There a lot of boggling variables here--such as the moisture content 
> and plasticity of the soil, height of backfill, direction of seismic 
> waves--so sizing the footings and rods, and determining how many to 
> install would be speculative. Maybe a big shaker would overcome this 
> effort. Or maybe it would hold up long enough for you to escape before 
> it all comes down. I don't envy your situation.
>
> -aa
>
>
>
> Alan Abrams*
> */certified professional building designer, AIBD
> certified passive house consultant, PHIUS/
> /certified passive house builder, PHIUS//
> /cell 202-437-8583
> alan at abramsdesignbuild.com <mailto:alan at abramsdesignbuild.com>
> HELICON WORKS /Architecture and Education/ 
> <http://www.heliconworks.com/index2.html>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:05 PM, ErgoDesk <ergodesk at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ergodesk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     California... I would reinforce your FIRE Insurance first.
>
>     Sincerely,
>     George Hawirko_
>     _
>     _http://about.me/StyroHome_
>
>
>     On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jason Holstine
>     <jason at amicusgreen.com <mailto:jason at amicusgreen.com>> wrote:
>
>
>         I think you can find retrofit resources online from
>         California. I think their state emergency mgmt agency, state
>         NAHB, etc. have docs. It could become a nice side biz
>         tightening up Okie corrals.
>
>
>
>         On 3/29/16 1:41 PM, "Bob Waldrop" <bwaldrop1952 at att.net
>         <http://bwaldrop1952@att.net>> wrote:
>
>         > So here in central Oklahoma, we have been experiencing a growing series
>         > of earthquakes over the last few years.   The USGS just
>         released a map
>         > showing the risk of human-induced earthquakes, and Okie City
>         is right
>         > there. The news said we were at perhaps a 10% risk of a level 6
>         > earthquake.  Most of the thus far have been in the 2 to 4 range.
>         >
>         > Now we are not only tornado alley, but also earthquake
>         central, more
>         > earthquakes last year even than California had.
>         >
>         > I lived in the Bay Area of California and in SLC (on top of
>         the actual
>         > wasatch fault a geologist friend told me), and never
>         experienced a
>         > quake, but I've felt several here. I've also been watching
>         the cracks
>         > in the interior plaster/lathe walls and my exterior brick
>         veneer develop
>         > and progress.
>         >
>         > I do have earthquake insurance, but it is really only good
>         for a
>         > complete catastrophe.  It has a 10% deductible, and it
>         doesn't cover
>         > masonry.
>         >
>         > The house has always seemed very sturdy.  It was built in
>         1929, the
>         > studs are on 12 to 14 inch centers and are a hard wood.  THe
>         sheathing
>         > is 1 x 8 planks.  Then there is brick veneer over that. The
>         foundation
>         > is brick.  The back and front porch construction seems
>         separate from the
>         > rest of the house. The concrete front porch is certainly
>         pulling away
>         > from the rest of the house over the 16 years I've lived here.
>         >
>         > Any thoughts about retrofits that would strengthen the house
>         in the face
>         > of the growing earthquake risk here?
>         >
>         > Bob Waldrop, Okie and Shaky City
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Greenbuilding mailing list
>         > to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>         > Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>         <http://Greenbuilding@bioenergylists.org>
>         >
>         > to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>         >
>         http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergy
>         > lists.org <http://lists.org>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Greenbuilding mailing list
>         to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>         Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>         <mailto:Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org>
>
>         to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>         http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Greenbuilding mailing list
>     to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>     Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>     <mailto:Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org>
>
>     to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>     http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20160330/5a870603/attachment.html>


More information about the Greenbuilding mailing list