[Greenbuilding] Zero sum game

[Reuben Deumling]

Perhaps a lesson there is that* technology isn't going to save us*?
I am sure I'm biased, but I've assumed this all along.

Figuring out how to use less has always been possible, and is perhaps still
the best way forward. I'd start with the goal of a ten-fold reduction in
direct energy use. When we've achieved that, let's regroup and see how much
of a problem we still have. ;-)

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:04 PM, sanjay jain via Greenbuilding <
greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org> wrote:

> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.
> bioenergylists.org
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: sanjay jain <sanjayjainuk at yahoo.co.uk>
> To: Green Building <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 21:04:20 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Zero sum game
> Hi all,
>
> I went to a industry related conference in Washington DC yesterday.
>
> It was interesting to see people there that were promoting Solar, making
> it more efficient and affordable. There were also folks from the oil/gas
> industries that were talking about lowering costs by automation.
>
> Sounds to me like both groups are basically undoing each others progress.
>
> ~sanjay
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180207/986d703d/attachment.html>