[Greenbuilding] rigid foam inside Larsen Truss?

Thu Jan 4 16:27:19 CST 2018

This is a remainder/seconds lot, something my local discount building
supplier has (or had) on hand. As an inveterate scrounger I tend to
think of the secondary market (this stuff could be seen as fitting
into that category) sends a less direct or even no signal to the
suppliers and as such can perhaps be more easily justified.
I'd not be inclined to purchase enough of these panels to sheet an
entire house at new prices, both because of cost and the reasons you
suggest.

I'm always open to learning more. I like the skip the foam panels
suggestion, seems simpler, but figured I should check with you folks
first.

On 1/4/18, Mike O'Brien <obrien at hevanet.com> wrote:
> Hi Reuben—
>
> After your eloquent advocacy on behalf of making your house as sustainable
> as possible, I am surprised you would consider using polystyrene as an
> insulation material. Styrene manufacturing has historically been a toxic
> polluter, and styrene products may themselves damage health. Here’s some
> background from the CDC: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp53-c6.pdf.
>
> Oregon code requires insulation under an electric water heater set on
> concrete, so we have one square of weight-bearing polystyrene to meet code,
> but I would have preferred zero.
>
> Best,
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2018, at 2:05 PM, Beatrice Dohrn via Greenbuilding
> <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org> wrote:
>
>
> From: Beatrice Dohrn <beatricedohrn at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] rigid foam inside Larsen Truss?
> Date: January 4, 2018 at 2:05:09 PM PST
> To: Green Building <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> Reply-To: Beatrice Dohrn <beatricedohrn at yahoo.com>
>
>
> If you are up for saying why -- I love to learn!
>
>
> Beatrice Dohrn
>
>
>
> From: Gordon West <gordon.west at rtnewmexico.com>
> To: greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] rigid foam inside Larsen Truss?
>
>
> Forget the foam, stick with cellulose.
>
> Gordon
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:00 PM,
>> greenbuilding-request at lists.bioenergylists.org
>> <mailto:greenbuilding-request at lists.bioenergylists.org> wrote:
>>
>> Send Greenbuilding mailing list submissions to
>> 	greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org
>> <mailto:greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> 	http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> 	greenbuilding-request at lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> 	greenbuilding-owner at lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Greenbuilding digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>   1. rigid foam inside Larsen Truss? (Reuben Deumling)
>>   2. Re: rigid foam inside Larsen Truss? (David Wentling)
>>   3. Re: rigid foam inside Larsen Truss? (RWT)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 08:32:58 -0800
>> From: Reuben Deumling <9watts at gmail.com>
>> To: Greenbuilding <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>> Subject: [Greenbuilding] rigid foam inside Larsen Truss?
>> Message-ID:
>> 	<CAE5fceAvHZHxN4uShFNPCysJcYD3R2mD8tVaxz_EBk0na+JNVQ at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> I have a line on 3-1/2" rigid foam panels for pretty cheap. My 1894 house
>> has (of course) 2x4 walls into which I've blown dense pack cellulose. For
>> stage 2, I was going to add a Larsen truss (another 2x4 wall with a big
>> cavity between inner and outer walls) and blow cellulose into the rest
>> for
>> an eventual 11" thick wall. But with these panels showing up I'm
>> wondering
>> if there are reasons not to place these as the middle layer of a
>> cellulose
>> sandwich? Seems like a quick and in this instance cheap way to get a lot
>> of
>> 'r'. But I also don't want to do anything stupid when it comes to
>> moisture.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180104/e5869fb9/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 09:54:59 -0700
>> From: David Wentling <dpwentling at ymail.com>
>> To: "greenbuilding bioenergylist.org"
>> 	<greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] rigid foam inside Larsen Truss?
>> Message-ID: <0C7356AE-A21F-45E3-8008-5B0EE1CCD6AA at ymail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> Historically, we have used the ratio of 1/3 R-value outside of any vapor
>> retarder.  Depending on the vapor characteristics of your foam, the amount
>> of insulation R-value you add, and the framing and sheathing present, will
>> determine if there would be a potential problem in the future.
>>
>> There are simple vapor models you can feed wall characteristics into and
>> they estimate where condensation may occur.
>>
>> You are right to be concern. Perhaps modeling may show just install the
>> foam board on the exterior and apply siding over, skipping the cost of the
>> Larsen truss. Or not.
>>
>> You do to know what you can not measure.
>>
>> David Wentling
>>
>> On Jan 4, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Reuben Deumling <9watts at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have a line on 3-1/2" rigid foam panels for pretty cheap. My 1894 house
>> has (of course) 2x4 walls into which I've blown dense pack cellulose. For
>> stage 2, I was going to add a Larsen truss (another 2x4 wall with a big
>> cavity between inner and outer walls) and blow cellulose into the rest for
>> an eventual 11" thick wall. But with these panels showing up I'm wondering
>> if there are reasons not to place these as the middle layer of a cellulose
>> sandwich? Seems like a quick and in this instance cheap way to get a lot
>> of 'r'. But I also don't want to do anything stupid when it comes to
>> moisture.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180104/955da46d/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 17:34:27 +0000 (UTC)
>> From: RWT <archilogic at yahoo.ca>
>> To: Green Building <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] rigid foam inside Larsen Truss?
>> Message-ID: <1842894756.428117.1515087267398 at mail.yahoo.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Reuben;
>> In the Olde Days before sim programs existed (ie before Win-Doze)? if one
>> didn't want to bother graphically determining the dew point for a double
>> stud wall assembly, the rule of thumb was to place the thing behaving as a
>> vapour retarder/air barrier membrane within the first 1/3 (from inside ->
>> out) of the total R-value of the wall assembly, in primarily heating
>> climates like mine (Ottawa Ontario Canada).?
>> ?For? 11" wide double-stud wall that used the same insulation in the three
>> layers (ie 2x4 interior? bearing wall + 3.5" cavity + 2x4 exterior curtain
>> wall) this meant that the VDR/AB membrane could be placed on the outside
>> of the bearing wall (usually backed up by structural sheathing) and the
>> outside 2/3 of the insulation placed in the walls before the walls were
>> tilted up? ... meaning that the walls were very well insulated and
>> air-sealed before the interior was sheathed (same procedure for ceiling)
>> so that the interior was toasty-warm in the middle of winter before any
>> HVAC was installed.??
>> ?It also meant that services could be installed in the bearing wall cavity
>> without having concerns (nightmares) about sub-trades compromising the
>> integrity of the VDR/AB membrane.
>>    On Thursday, January 4, 2018, 11:34:48 AM EST, Reuben Deumling
>> <9watts at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have a line on 3-1/2" rigid foam panels for pretty cheap. My 1894 house
>> has (of course) 2x4 walls into which I've blown dense pack cellulose. For
>> stage 2, I was going to add a Larsen truss (another 2x4 wall with a big
>> cavity between inner and outer walls) and blow cellulose into the rest for
>> an eventual 11" thick wall. But with these panels showing up I'm wondering
>> if there are reasons not to place these as the middle layer of a cellulose
>> sandwich? Seems like a quick and in this instance cheap way to get a lot
>> of 'r'. But I also don't want to do anything stupid when it comes to
>> moisture.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180104/83e894f0/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of Greenbuilding Digest, Vol 89, Issue 1
>> ********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org <mailto:Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org>
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
> <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>