<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:51 AM, lee Weaver <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lgweaver@gmail.com">lgweaver@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Apparently the Navy is
held to a higher standard than municipal systems. Since everything
they were saying is you could literally take a glass full of the
discharge and drink it and it be potable. I was under the
impression that all systems were held to the same standard.<br></div></blockquote><div>At what lifecycle cost ($, material, energy, etc.) is this accomplished? <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
Also are you saying that the ammounts we pay don't cover the costs
of delivery & treatment? If so please explain the Privately
held companies that do either or both of these items? they do
exist. not all municipal systems are owned by the city. <br></div></blockquote><div>I am not preoccupied with costs in financial terms as much as in the materials and energy that are ground up in the process. Low entropy isn't something you can buy back with money. <br>
</div><br></div>