<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Radiation is a word that describes anything that radiates away from
    something.  Audio speakers emit radiation in the form of air
    pressure waves that our ears are able to sense.  Audio radiation is
    very different from electromagnetic radiation which in turn is very
    different from nuclear radiation.<br>
    <br>
    Heat is infrared radiation/electromagnetic radiation with a
    frequency from 300 GHz to 400 THz.<br>
    Visible light is electromagnetic radiation with a frequency from 405
    THz to 790 THz.<br>
    Both of these forms of electromagnetic radiation are produced by
    campfires, fireplaces, and light bulbs...things we are very familiar
    with.<br>
    <br>
    Microwave ovens use electromagnetic radiation approximately centered
    around 2.4 GHz to heat objects.<br>
    Radios and TVs use electromagnetic radiation in the KHz and MHz
    frequencies to transmit their signals wirelessly.<br>
    Mobile phones use electromagnetic radiation in a range of
    frequencies under 2.4 Ghz, mostly 850-900 MHz and 1800-1900 MHz.<br>
    <br>
    Wireless devices all use some portion of the electromagnetic
    spectrum.<br>
    Solar tie-in: In fact, one could consider solar panels (thermal AND
    electric) to be wireless devices/wireless receivers that are used to
    collect electromagnetic energy that the sun transmits to the Earth.<br>
    <br>
    The intensity of wireless signals various significantly, largely
    depending on the frequencies and communication distances involved. 
    Wireless smart power meters are on the lower end of range of
    intensities.  We regularly accept and use stronger transmitters in
    our lives everyday in things like cell phones an wifi devices
    (laptops, smartphones, iPads, etc.).<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    It is useful to keep in mind that the actual risk posed by a
    potential danger is a function of:<br>
    1.) peak dose<br>
    2.) cumulative dose for things that accumulate<br>
    3.) repair rate/damage tolerance<br>
    <br>
    If a peak dose is too high, repair/control mechanisms cannot keep up
    with the damage.  It is like receiving 12" of rain in an hour vs. 1"
    per day over 12 days.  One is a flash flood disaster, the other
    leaves everything soggy.<br>
    <br>
    If the cumulative dose is too high, trouble can also ensue.  This is
    like receiving 1" of rain everyday, day-in-and-day-out.  If you live
    in a closed basin with no drainage, the water levels will first
    saturate the soil and then start to rise and flood you as it
    accumulates.  If there is drainage, you now live in a rain forest.<br>
    <br>
    Repair rates might be thought of the sandbags around homes and sump
    pumps placed in basements to keep the basements and homes from
    flooding.  If a sudden sustained peak water ingress rate or median
    water ingress rate (determined by soil permeability and sandbag wall
    effectiveness) exceeds the pumping capacity, then damage will
    occur.  In workstation/server class computers and on CDs/DVDs, error
    correcting codes (ECC) provide the repair and data integrity
    mechanisms to protect against random data corruption (single bit
    flips, media scratches, etc.).  In humans there are DNA repair
    mechanisms that attempt to correct damage to our DNA strands.  As
    long as the repair mechanism is stronger than the damage dose, no
    permanent harm is done.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Finally, it is useful to keep risks in perspective.  As a society we
    have spent billions to prevent some low probability events while
    ignoring the opportunity costs of not preventing other higher
    probability events.  An example...we have decent estimates for the
    numbers of preventable medical errors and related deaths that occur
    each year, yet that's not given nearly as much attention as it would
    likely otherwise have if those were related to air travel or foreign
    boogymen.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    On 8/4/2011 10:11 PM, natural building wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:6ECC8CE1-472A-4AF3-A842-2701001BDF0F@shaw.ca"
      type="cite">It's fascinating and frustrating to read about the
      Ontario MicroFIT PV program while here in BC we are having
      so-called wireless 'Smart Meters' forced upon us without
      consultation or choice.
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The World Health organization very recently listed EMF
        radiation as a class 2b carcinogen - alongside DDT, Lead and
        gasoline exhaust, to name a few - and yet the BC government in
        its wisdom thinks it's safe and prudent to authorize the
        installation of new wireless meters on every house in the
        province without the owners consent at a cost of almost $1
        billion and the loss of at least 400 meter-reader jobs.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>What they really should be doing is investing that money and
        effort in renewable, like Ontario...</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>
        <div>
          <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:
            separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica;
            font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;
            font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height:
            normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
            white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;"><span
              class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate;
              color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size:
              12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;
              font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height:
              normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform:
              none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;">
              <div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><span
                  class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:
                  separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica;
                  font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant:
                  normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;
                  line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px;
                  text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
                  word-spacing: 0px;">
                  <div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><span
                      class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse:
                      separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family:
                      Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal;
                      font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal;
                      letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal;
                      orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform:
                      none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
                      word-spacing: 0px;">
                      <div style="word-wrap: break-word;">
                        <div>
                          <div style="margin: 0px; font: 12px Papyrus;
                            color: rgb(255, 160, 18);">
                            <div style="margin: 0px; font: 12px Papyrus;
                              color: rgb(99, 10, 255);"><span
                                class="Apple-style-span"
                                style="font-size: 18px;">Steve Satow</span></div>
                            <div style="margin: 0px; font: 12px Papyrus;
                              color: rgb(99, 10, 255);"><br>
                            </div>
                            <div style="margin: 0px; font: 12px Papyrus;
                              color: rgb(99, 10, 255);"><a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="http://www.naturalbuildingsite.net">www.naturalbuildingsite.net</a></div>
                            <div style="margin: 0px; font: 12px Papyrus;
                              color: rgb(99, 10, 255);"><a
                                moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="mailto:naturalbuilding@shaw.ca">naturalbuilding@shaw.ca</a></div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </span></div>
                </span></div>
            </span></span>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div>
          <div>On 2011-08-04, at 7:21 PM, Frank Tettemer wrote:</div>
          <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div>Hi All, Here's some more fun data to add to the mix!<br>
              <br>
              I mentioned our non-tracker/over-loaded-panels before,
              briefly.  I'll describe it again.<br>
              We've mounted 13,000 watts DC panels, in agreement with
              the Ontario Power Authority to sell, at max., 10 Kw per
              hour.<br>
              Our thinking is to be able to produce (and sell) 10 Kw per
              hour from 9AM to 4 PM,<br>
              with variously smaller hourly productions before and after
              those times of day.<br>
              <br>
              These sunny summer days, we vary from 75 to 92 Kw per day
              sold to the power authority.  We, of course produce more
              than that, from 9 until 4, but the inverters cut off the
              over-production, sending only the allowed 10Kw per hour to
              the grid.<br>
              <br>
              This corresponds to the tracker claims, mentioned by
              others on the list.  And as expected, the trackers
              generate their 35% more, on these summer sunny days.
               However, for over half the year, our seasonally adjusted
              array produces only 15% less than other local trackers.
              And in Winter, our array produces almost the same amount
              as other local trackers with 11,000 watts DC on them.<br>
              <br>
              We change the angle to 45 degrees around Late August/Early
              September.<br>
              We change again to about 65-70 degrees to horizontal in
              October/Early November.<br>
              We change again, back to 45 degrees, in Late
              February/Early March.<br>
              And we change to Summer Mode, at 25 degrees, in Late
              April/Early May.<br>
              <br>
              Please Note that we definitely Do Not change angles on the
              Solstice nor the Equinox.<br>
              That timing would be exactly the Wrong Time to change
              angles!!!<br>
              <br>
              Some background to the Ontario microFIT program:<br>
              They pay 81 cents per Kw produced, up to a maximum of 10
              Kw per hour, for ground mounted arrays, for the early
              adapters of last years applications..<br>
              A common installation has about 11,000 watts DC of panels.
               We have added about $6,000.00 more in panels, or 2,000
              more watts DC.<br>
              <br>
              This means we produce more full 10Kw each hour than the
              standard 11,000 watts arrays, because we have invested
              more in panels but not in tracking devices.<br>
              A common fixed, seasonally adjustable array with 11,000 of
              PV's is averaging a little over $10,000 income from
              production in this area.<br>
              And like John Staube has mentioned about his area of
              Southern Ontario, there are over 100 microFIT
              installations now in production in our local County of
              Renfrew, all within a 45 minute drive of us, any
              direction,<br>
              <br>
              and 95% of these people are small family farms.<br>
              <br>
              So if an installation varies from $65,000 in cost to
              $95,000 in cost, or with trackers, $120,000 in cost, you
              can see how an annual gross income of about $10,000 would
              take close to half of the 20 year contract to pay off the
              investment.<br>
              <br>
              Our over-paneled-array will hopefully average us over
              $13,000 per year. As we did our own design, purchasing and
              installation, with about $3,000 paid input from a local
              electrician, our initial investment of time and cash will
              pay off in a bit under six years.<br>
              We won't get rich, after that, but we won't be concerned
              about tracker maintenance, either.<br>
              <br>
              Frank Tettemer<br>
              Living Sol ~ Building and Design<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.livingsol.com">www.livingsol.com</a><br>
              613 756 3884<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              ================= More Forwarded material
              ==================<br>
              <br>
              WatJohn and I have a mutual friend (Don Fugler) here in
              Ottawa , now retired, who used to pedal to and from work
              every day, year round.<br>
              <br>
              In winter, those bike trips both ways would be in the dark
              ... the sun not yet having risen in the mornings (7-ish)
              and already long gone in the evenings (4:30-ish).<br>
              <br>
              OTOH in summer the northeastern sky will often be a
              spectacular blazing red in the hour before 6 am and I
              remember many June nights working outside until almost 10
              pm without having to use artificial light.<br>
              <br>
              The Unbelieving Heathens on this List were having trouble
              swallowing the production figures for my neighbour's 10 KW
              single-axis tracking array. Well, those UHs are probably
              going to gag on the following which came from a person
              whose company has just brought their dual-axis tracking
              system out of R&D and put it on-line.<br>
              (I don't know him personally (but I did meet his partner
              when he was out pitching their single-axis system and my
              SlipperySalesDevil hackles were activated) so I can't
              vouch for the veracity of his claims as I would for those
              of my llama-rancher neighbour.<br>
              <br>
              ================= Forwarded material ==================<br>
              <br>
              Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:10 PM<br>
              Subject: Weekly update...<br>
              <br>
              This is an excellent day for [partner] and me because our
              first dual-axis has been tracking perfectly for 1 week<br>
              <snip><br>
              As my wife transcribed for me last week, we have no idea
              how effective our system is going to be, but for an
              astonishing figure, our first dual-axis has produced an
              average of 134 Kw per day over the last 3 days and even 38
              Kw today as of 4pm in all this cloud cover and rain. These
              are amazing figures that NO COMPETITOR can touch.<br>
              <snip><br>
              <br>
              =============== End of forwarded material ===============<br>
              (Presumably those are "kWh" not "kW" and yes, I too am
              having a bit of trouble swallowing some of the above
              ...the bit about the competition, in particular)<br>
              <br>
              On those June days, my llamaRancher neighbour's
              single-axis array was producing in the neighbourhood of
              100 kWh per day, roughly 40% better the the nearby Enphase
              fixed array.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:09:25 -0400, jfstraube
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jfstraube@gmail.com"><jfstraube@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">PVwatts.org is a wonderful website
                calculator for PV output that I use all the time.<br>
              </blockquote>
              <snip><br>
              <blockquote type="cite">In Ottawa, it predicts a full
                2-axis tracker will produce 36% more electricity than
                ideally sloped fixed system. I beleive it.<br>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite"><br>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">On 2011-08-04, at 7:05 AM, Haudy
                Kazemi wrote:<br>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite"><br>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">When most people use the power
                  output calculators/estimators,<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">they look at the annual
                  production figures not the daily figures.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite"> A tracker in a high latitude
                  may make larger differencein the summer than in the
                  winter because the arc of the sun is longer,<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite"> A fixed array in those
                  conditions will self-shade in the early and late parts
                  of the day.  This may the root of the daily difference
                  between the reported performance difference between
                  the tracked and non-tracked array.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">During summer, tracked array may
                  outproduce the non-tracked array by the ~40% reported
                  in this discussion thread.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">During spring/fall, tracked
                  array may outproduce non-tracked array by 20%.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">During winter, with a short arc,
                  tracked array may outproduce non-tracked array by 5%.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">On an annual basis the tracked
                  array may only exceed the non-tracked array by ~20%,
                  even it does better than that in the summer.<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">Perhaps someone can check this
                  in a calculator?<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite"><br>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">On 8/3/2011 8:00 PM, Nick Pyner
                  wrote:<br>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">I just think nobody is taking
                    the geography in to account.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">There are plenty of PV
                    installations around here , but I have never seen or
                    heard of a tracking one. This is probably because
                    there is no point in them. The situation could  be
                    quite different in the more frigid parts of the
                    world for two reasons.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">1. Even in what is laughably
                    called the banana belt of Canada, the insolation is
                    not that great, and the skies are not so clear, so
                    you would need to chase every watt you can find.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">2. In the summer, the days are
                    longer. Hence the practical window of opportunity
                    may be as much as an hour wider, but the hourly
                    march of the sun is the same.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">A tracking system helps in
                    both cases, and this heathen would imagine the more
                    polar you get the more sense a tracker will make.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">Nick Pyner<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">Dee Why   NSW (Australia)<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">-----Original Message-----<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">From:
                    <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:greenbuilding-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org">greenbuilding-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>
                    [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:greenbuilding-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org">mailto:greenbuilding-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>]On
                    Behalf Of RT<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011
                    2:59 PM<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">I told him that I had been
                    telling people (this List) that his single-axis
                    tracking array had produced 40 and sometimes 44%
                    more than the Enphase fixed array and that you (the
                    Listmembers) were telling me that I was full of
                    $#!+.<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite"><br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <blockquote type="cite">We both just shrugged our
                    shoulders (as if to say "Nyeh! What can you do about
                     unbelieving heathens ?")<br>
                  </blockquote>
                </blockquote>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              <br>
              -- <br>
              === * ===<br>
              Rob Tom<br>
              <br>
              -- <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              Greenbuilding mailing list<br>
              to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Greenbuilding@bioenergylists.org">Greenbuilding@bioenergylists.org</a><br>
              <br>
              to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web
              page<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Greenbuilding mailing list
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Greenbuilding@bioenergylists.org">Greenbuilding@bioenergylists.org</a>

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>