[Stoves] Chimneys

[Crispin Pemberton-Pigott]

Dear Joyce

 

There are two answers to your question. The first is that CO is not all that
big a problem for most people. Yes it is a problem in certain places,
Johannesburg and the col burning Highveld regions for example, but smoke
exposure is a much larger concern in my experience.

 

The second is that chimneys are relative expensive. If you put a chimney on
a stove that is not very clean burning, it quickly gets clogged and is a
maintenance problem.  An example of this is the stoves made from clay and
sand in Kenya. In the high regions (tea estates especially) there are 'fuel
efficient stoves' promoted by the tea estate corporations as a beneficial
idea. They have chimneys but are pretty dreadful is terms of combustion
efficiency. In as little as 3 months a 3 inch diameter chimney gets clogged
with condensed, boiled biomass vapours. The stove have chimneys but don't
really save much fuel and waste a great deal of it by simply not burning the
gases. 

 

So chimney are not as easy to work with as one would hope. Cleaning up the
combustion is actually the most important if there is nearly zero money in
the community. 

 

Chimney stoves, in answer to your question about the effect of putting on a
chimney, have to have pretty good air control or they are not very
efficient.

 

Attached is a chart of a coal stove with a chimney attached, and no flue
damper to control the draft. There is really no way for anyone to know how
and when to close or partially close a damper for optimum efficiency. This
is the result of an open chimney attached to a fairly large fire. The peak
burning rate can be seen by looking for the steepest portion of the brown
line. That is the mass burned during the operation.

 

As you can see the initial burn rate is low so the line is nearly
horizontal, then it gets going like crazy to about 16 kW. Then the coal runs
out and the burn rate slows. Then it is refuelled with a sharp jump up which
tapers off in the end after about 200 minutes.

 

The thermal efficiency is the green lines, The darker one that moves up and
down is the instantaneous efficiency calculated from the temperature of the
gases in the chimney and the excess air at the time. The smoother green line
is the cumulative efficiency, meaning how things have gone so far, all
things considered. Two features are noticeable. The first is that it is
pretty constant at about 65% efficient when the fire is large and burning at
a high rate. The second is that as the fire dies down, the thermal
efficiency drops to zero and in fact goes negative. Because it is negative
(the fire is actually cooling the room by throwing more heat up the chimney
than it is generating) the average for the whole burn drops from 60% at
minute 100 to 33% at minute 200. That is amazing, eh?

 

So putting on a chimney does not guarantee overall success. The main reason
for the poor performance is excessive draft - there is simply too much air
getting into the stove, allowing it to operate at a high power level - too
high to be useful actually. This is followed by a period when the stove
cools the home drawing, as it does, about 50 cubic metres of -35 degree C
air into the house to feed the fire.

 

So, chimneys make things a lot more complicated providing expected results
and additional expense. The expense is not just for the chimney which might
cost $5, but also for a stove that is air tight enough to control the
combustion reasonably and now waste fuel.

 

Best regards

Crispin

 

++++++++

 

Why is no one talking about chimneys that get rid of the CO safely? And
doesn't the addition of a chimney change the dynamics of any stove?

 

Joyce M Lockard

rj.lockard at frontier.com

503-533-4190 Home

503-201-9548 Cell

503-533-4209 Fax

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20101031/5d7c2217/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Traditional stove, front lighting, 22-Aug-2010 Efficiency.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 132449 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20101031/5d7c2217/attachment.jpe>