[Stoves] Cleaning Dung changes the dung.

Sarbagya Tuladhar sarbagya007 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 00:30:12 CDT 2012


Thats certainly the case Richard coz the chloride component is washed away
on briquetting. Hence, explains the halogen (copper wire) test.

Cheers

Sarbagya

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Richard Stanley
<rstanley at legacyfound.org>wrote:

> Paul et al.,
> When Fransic kavita a thousands miles form any discussion son this list,
> prepares a smokeless briquette ot of co=w or elphant or camle dung he is
> washing out  much of the non fibrous solids. The dung is in other words no
> longer pure dung but a densified collection of largely just the fibers
> contained in dung.  He figured out the optimal content by "feel" but what
> dos he know with his 4th grade education eh ?
>
> How we combine these diverse approaches with a fair representation in this
> numeralised reductionist world but combine them we must.
>
> Richard Stanley
> www.legacyfound.org
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Paul S. Anderson wrote:
>
> Dear Sarbagya, Ron and all,
>
> 1. So you had contact with the Univ of Adelaide fellows!!!  Great guys who
> attended the BEF Stove Camp in Australia about a year ago.  Please share
> with us any and all of their reports, plus your work.
>
> 2.  Seems you are not at U of Adelaide any longer, correct?  What
> university are you with?
>
> 3.  Now that we know you are using a Servals Champion TLUD, there can be
> comparative data from Servals and also from a study done in Nepal a couple
> of years back.  I assume that you have that report?  And we ask Sujatha and
> Rajan at Servals to provide other data if available.
>
> 4.  I agree with Ron that the word "burn" should be avoided.  Better to
> use pyrolyzed, and char-gasification and some term for "complete combustion
> of the fuel" (meaning both the pyrolysis and the char-gasification that
> results in only ash remaining).
>
> 5. You wrote:
> > We experimented by burning about 290 grams of dung briquettes. This took
> a total of 7 minutes to boil 1.5 l of water as opposed to using 325 grams
> of unwashed dung to boil the same amount of water in 21 minutes. The type
> of stove used to conduct this experiment was a traditional 2 pot mud stove.
>
> Something seems out of wack here, and suggests replication is needed.  The
> moisture content of BOTH fuels should be noted.  And I doubt that the
> traditional 2-pot mud stove will give very consistent results.  The
> unwashed dung is only 10% more weight but burned for three times as long.
>  And accomplishd the same task of boiling 1.5 liters of water.  Too many
> unclear issues to simply accept those numbers.
>
> 6.  Also, is what is washed from dung better, same, or worse for energy
> content than what is left in the washed dung?  This has probably been
> studied, but I do not know that answer.  Anybody?
>
> Clearly your study has attracted the interest of some on this Stoves
> Listserv.  Please keep us posted, and tell us you timetable for main parts
> of your work.
>
> Paul
>
> Paul S. Anderson, PhD
> Known to some as:    Dr TLUD      Doc      Professor
> Phone (USA): 309-452-7072   SKYPE: paultlud   Email: psanders at ilstu.edu
> www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/giz2011-en-micro-gasification.pdf (excellent ref.)
> My website specific for TLUD information: www.drtlud.com  =
> www.DrTLUD.com
>
>
> Quoting SARBAGYA TULADHAR <sarbagya007 at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > I have not yet got to the stage of optimizing stove features as yet.
> However, I am working on the secondary air inlets for the combustion of the
> gases inside the combustion chamber which would aid in the heat transfer to
> the cooking pot. Well, we did conduct experiments on "combusting" the dung.
> We also did the dung briquettes. The dung cakes in its raw form (without
> briquetting) yields a lumpy form of ash which does not break down thus
> posing problems in the combustion chamber as blocks the entry of primary
> air. However, the community used this ash-form to washing their dishes and
> also as a manure in the fields. With the dung briquettes, the ash form was
> no more lumpy and thus was not blocking the entry of primary air. Dung
> briquetting yielded an amazing find as the liquid content on "dung washing"
> could be used as fertilizers in the fields thus improving soil altogether.
> >
> > We experimented by burning about 290 grams of dung briquettes. This took
> a total of 7 minutes to boil 1.5 l of water as opposed to using 325 grams
> of unwashed dung to boil the same amount of water in 21 minutes. The type
> of stove used to conduct this experiment was a traditional 2 pot mud stove.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Sarbagya
> >
> > On 18/03/2012, at 12:21 PM, rongretlarson at comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> Sarbagya and list:
> >>
> >>  I tried googling for your project and found something almost a year
> ago from Josh Wilkey on this list.  I think we can help you a lot more if
> your team has produced a report.  Since you are doing CFD, it would be
> helpful to know what you have been learning from that.  Have you optimized
> anything yet?
> >>
> >>  Since you are using the Servals unit and only getting 12 minutes at a
> time, it is obvious that you need to densify. - which presumably means
> pelletizing.  Since you are intending operations in Nepal, and maybe rural
> Nepal, maybe you have discarded that option.  But I would look
> >>
> >> You scare me when you use a sentence like this (from below - and
> similar was used by Josh):
> >>      "So what could be the heat output from burning 1 kg. of dung."
> >> Are you truly  "burning" - which I take to mean no char output?
> >>  Can you give us some more ideas on what you have already learned from
> your experiments?  Are you getting (or could you obtain) about 25% char yiel
> >> You asked below about energy content of the dung per kg.  I think it
> must be about 15-18 MJ - depending on the ash content.
> >>
> >>   I worry a great deal about "burning" dung.  The whole point of making
> char is to improve the soil and maybe especially in Nepal.  But Char from
> dung can be of extra value - as proven in numerous soil experiments.   Is
> you team into the soil side of char at all?   I hope that the word "burn"
> is a misnomer.
> >>
> >>  You asked about the flame temperatures.  This will be strongly
> dependent on the excess air you are getting.  Can you supply any data on
> the weight of a fuel load that lasts 12 minutes?  What is the volume of the
> fuel space and the shape (and density) of that fuel.  I would think your
> own tests could supply temperature data - using thermocouples.
> >>
> >>  I would look closely at the Georgia Tech computations of the last few
> days on this list and see if they might not answer some of your questions.
> >>
> >>  For others - the Servals unit is a nice looking commercial  TLUD unit
> from Chennai India, developed with Paul Anderson. See
> >>    http://servalsgroup.blogspot.com/
> >> and
> >>   http://www.slideshare.net/bitmaxim/servals-tlud-biomass-stove-deck
> >> (and there are more)
> >>
> >> I have seen some technical data in these, but assume there must be a
> good bit more.  Paul?
> >>
> >>
> >> Ron
> >>
> >> From: "Sarbagya Tuladhar" <sarbagya007 at gmail.com>
> >> To: "Paul S. Anderson" <psanders at ilstu.edu>
> >> Cc: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <
> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org>
> >> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 5:37:57 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Stoves] Cleaning Dung
> >>
> >> Hi Paul,
> >> Dung burning using TLUD as a project had been conducted by the final
> year students of uni of Adelaide of which I was lucky to be a part of. This
> project was conducted under the EWB Australia humanitarian undergraduate
> project. Excellent work was done on this. I would very much try to
> incorporate their findings in my report.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Sarbagya
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> On 18/03/2012, at 7:00 AM, "Paul S. Anderson" <psanders at ilstu.edu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sarbagya,
> >>>
> >>> I want to encourage your research on modelling cookstoves in Nepal.
> >>>
> >>> Please be aware of the Improved Cookstoves called TLUDs and the newest
> (and major) variation called TChar (TLUD top and Charcoal stove base).
> (TChar is described in 3 documents at    www.drtlud.com   and is the
> focal point of some stove initiatives in Uganda and Haiti.)  Some studies
> of TLUD stove issues in Nepal have been conducted, with favorable results,
> but limited by lack of funding in the recent past.
> >>>
> >>> The TLUD stoves (including the TChar variation) can utilize dung
> briquette fuels very well.  In India I successfully experimented with "dung
> tablets" that are easy to make in sizes such as rectangles that are 2 - 3
> cm on each side and about 1.5 to 2.5 cm thick.
> >>>
> >>> I hope that your modelling will include the TLUD approach to using
> dung as fuel.
> >>>
> >>> Members of this Stoves Listserv would appreciate knowing more about
> you, your university, and objectives and methods.
> >>>
> >>> Doc
> >>> --
> >>> Paul S. Anderson, PhD
> >>> Known to some as:    Dr TLUD      Doc      Professor
> >>> Phone (USA): 309-452-7072   SKYPE: paultlud   Email:
> psanders at ilstu.edu
> >>> www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/giz2011-en-micro-gasification.pdf (excellent
> ref.)
> >>> My website specific for TLUD information: www.drtlud.com  =
> www.DrTLUD.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Quoting SARBAGYA TULADHAR <sarbagya007 at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Stovers,
> >>>>
> >>>> I am undertaking my uni graduate project on the  Use of CFD for the
> study of heat transfer and convection in a Dung Burning Cookstove. With
> this project, a heat transfer and convection analysis would be carried out
> using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for the optimization of dung
> burning cooktove that is currently being developed in Nepal. The analysis
> would involve simulation to predict the performance of the cookstove and
> would set up a benchmark for improved stove manufacturing in Nepal. This
> analysis would also assist in providing the experimental and the simulation
> results towards getting the stove certified as an ?Improved Cookstove?.
> >>>>
> >>>> However to simulate the dung burning I had to resort to using the
> fixed heat source instead as modeling combustion/pyrolysis of dung was
> beyond the scope of the project. So what could be the heat output from
> burning 1 kg. of dung. How mush heat would be released from this ? Is that
> the calorific value dung ? As I would be using a fixed temperature heat
> source, what could be that temperature ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>>
> >>>> Sarbagya Tuladhar
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13/02/2012, at 2:27 AM, Anand Karve wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Dear Richard,
> >>>>> The undigested solid matter in the dung is in fact the
> lignocellulosic matter, However, in the case of ruminents, it is not in a
> fibrous form but in the form of particles due to the practice of chewing
> the cud.  It is the dung of non-ruminents, like horses and elephants that
> has fibres.
> >>>>> Yours
> >>>>> A.D.Karve
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Richard Stanley <
> rstanley at legacyfound.org> wrote:
> >>>>> Ad,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't personally think the solids would be of much value for a
> good briquette:  What I would look for personally, is  your lignocellulosic
> material, ( the more fibrous stuff)  to encapsulate other more carbon rich
> salt free, materials sawdust charcoal crumbs/ dust, selected agro residues
> with aromatic-or non aromatic- considerations depending upon what kind of
> fuel aroma and duration of heat you desire.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Richard Stanley
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Anand Karve wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cattle dung consists mainly of non-digestible lignocellulosic
> material, millions of micro-organisms, mucus produced by the animals and by
> the microbes, and some minerals. In fact it is the microbes and the mucus
> in the dung that yield biogas on anaerobic fermentation.  A pressurised
> sieve, technically called a filter press, is the best device for separating
> the non-soluble solids from the fluids. If the fluids contained the
> microbes and the mucus, they should be subjected to anaerobic digestion
> before allowing them to be used as manure.  Dung also has a very high ash
> content, because of which its calorific value is rather low. Dry dung has
> calorific value of about 3500 kcal/kg.  Has anybody measured the calorific
> value of the solids in the dung, after removal of the fluids from it by
> using a filter press?
> >>>>> Yours
> >>>>> A.D.Karve
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Sarbagya Tuladhar <
> sarbagya007 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Boston
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I volunteered with EWB Australia in Nepal working on a clean dung
> burning stove and thus worked with the dung as a fuel . Washing of the dung
> was done and briquettes which was a real success. Paper pulp used as a
> binder worked really well. Also the chloride contents of the dung which is
> responsible for watery eyes was removed on washing the dung which was
> proven by the copper wire test. We even fabricated a simple dung press for
> the same. The liquid portion of the dung was reutilised as manure in the
> fields. Thus the whole sceptism about "should" use dung as manure in the
> fields and not as a cooking fuel was somewhat solved. Did not test the NPK
> contents of the liquid portion though...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sarbagya
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/02/2012, at 2:06 AM, Boston Nyer <bostonnyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm looking to clean/rinse cow dung and do not have any experience
> doing so.  Does anyone have any experience cleaning dung and would like to
> share?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you!
> >>>>>> Boston
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Boston
> >>>>>> Skype: BostonNyer
> >>>>>> Cell: (585) 503-3459
> >>>>>> www.burndesignlab.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> This message was sent using Illinois State University RedbirdMail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Stoves mailing list
> >>
> >> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> >> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
> >>
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> >>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> >>
> >> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> >> http://www.bioenergylists.org/
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using Illinois State University RedbirdMail
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://www.bioenergylists.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://www.bioenergylists.org/
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20120319/2df3d80c/attachment.html>


More information about the Stoves mailing list