[Stoves] Continuous gasifier for household scale - experience sharing
alexis belonio
atbelonio at yahoo.com
Tue May 14 21:30:16 CDT 2013
Hi All,
Good morning from here at Ph!!!
I agree that the multiple-burner would be more applicable for continuous-type rice husk gas stove. This more advantageous for cottage or small industry applications. I build several of these already and many likes the design. Try this link http://www.ndmi.co.in/Gasifire.html. Navdurga Metal Industries in India improved the basic design of this stove already. I have also a cooperating manufacturer in Vietnam who is doing another version of this stove.
Good day!!
Alexis
________________________________
From: "rongretlarson at comcast.net" <rongretlarson at comcast.net>
To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves <stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org>
Cc: alexis belonio <atbelonio at yahoo.com>; Tuong DoDuc <tuong.do at devi-renewable.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Continuous gasifier for household scale - experience sharing
Paul etal adding Tuong in case he is not on list.
I am on your side.
But I hate to discourage any innovation at this stage. Alexis' two burner down draft seems to be a nice addition to the options users will have. Maybe that is the right starting point.
Ron
________________________________
From: "Paul Olivier" <paul.olivier at esrla.com>
To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org>
Cc: "alexis belonio" <atbelonio at yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:37:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Continuous gasifier for household scale - experience sharing
Ron,
I am primarily concerned about what happens on a household level. Here stoves have to be small, lightweight, mobile, simple, durable, long-lasting, beautiful and inexpensive. The moment the process is continuous, so many of these features are lost. At the same time, if I'm not prepared to put it in my kitchen, why should I expect poor people to do so?
Paul
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:26 AM, <rongretlarson at comcast.net> wrote:
Paul etal
>
> I'll bet you are right, but maybe a small restaurant? He seems to want continuous operation. Maybe heating. Maybe he and Alexis can pull it off.
>
> Have you seen what Alex English has done? All automated. Super clean. Only have to drop the size by about 1000x (maybe 100x)
>
>Ron
>
>>________________________________
>From: "Paul Olivier" <paul.olivier at esrla.com>
>
>To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>Cc: "alexis belonio" <atbelonio at yahoo.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 6:22:08 PM
>
>Subject: Re: [Stoves] Continuous gasifier for household scale - experience sharing
>
>
>Ron,
>
>Note the subject of this thread: "Continuous gasifier for household scale". I come back to my initial response: is this device not a bit complicated and messy to operate on the level of a household? Think about the dust associated with continually loading rice hulls into the device, and think about the dust and fumes associated with continually scrapping out char from the bottom of the device. This continual loading of rice hulls and unloading of char takes place in the kitchen where food is in all stages of preparation. Would you want to install such a device in your kitchen?
>
>Thanks.
>Paul Olivier
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 5:57 AM, <rongretlarson at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Tuong , Paul, Alexis, and list:
>>
>> 1. First, thanks to Paul. I was preparing a response with the same recommendation to speak with Engr. Belonio
>>
>> 2. Tuong's message is an important one for this
list. Thanks for bringing this investigation to the list's attention.
It is great that SNV is supporting your work - that is the first
important reason in your. message
>>
>> 3. When I first looked at Tuong's video and
read the interaction with Dr. Olivier, I thought this was all TLUD. It
is not, which is the second and third reasons your message is
important. You are describing two differences: a) BLDD, and b)
continuous operation. Both we rarely hear of for stoves. I can agree with Dr.
Olivier on the advantages of batch - but I think it great that you are
making this effort to expand the range of stove options.
>>
>> 4. When googling, I found that there is a lot of info at Paul Anderson's site (even though we are not talking TLUD here - which Paul has not mentioned below. Clearly all the individual addressees know this but the list may not. Many Belonio designs there including the one we are being asked about by Tuong.
>>
>> 5. . As to your request for some thoughts on improvements. Paul gave all mine, save one: these nice units still require a manual removal of the char - a feature we'd all like to improve upon. The following addresses that.
>>
>> 6. Before learning of the above, and only knowing of your desire to have a
continuously operating stove, I thought I would mention several larger
units that might offer some possibility at smaller scale (while still
producing char, of course)
>> a. Look up what Alex English has
done to modify an existing chain grate burner. By speeding it up, he
could have char instead of ash come off the end. He has or can have a
water barrier at the output to control air.
>> b. Danny Day
(Eprida) had a horizontal auger system maybe a decade ago - and is just
this month beginning to operate a new one, I believe
>> c. I believe Paul Anderson may have something similar for residential heating - company Chip Energy
>> d. Jerry Whitfield maybe same. See http://www.whitfieldbiochar.com/
>> e. Marc Pare worked with a large continuous system in Ho Chi Minh City for brick making. Might be transferable to small scale.
>>
>>All these char production designers should be easy to locate via googling. Mostly not thinking cook stoves, but they are thinking continuous, non-TLUD char-making. Your and Alexs' efforts with BLDD may also pay off in the same way, but it seems you will to move the char in some way mechanically - as all five above do.
>>
>>Ron
>>>>________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>________________________________
>>From: "Paul Anderson" <psanders at ilstu.edu>
>>
>>To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>>Cc: "alexis belonio" <atbelonio at yahoo.com>
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:36:20 PM
>>
>>Subject: Re: [Stoves] Continuous gasifier for household scale - experience sharing
>>
>>
>>Dear SNV and Tuong DoDuc,
>>
>>I have not worked with continuous feed rice-husk gasifiers. I
have had success with using dry woodchips/pellets, but not
financially viable at household level.
>>
>>The rice husk expert is Alexis Belonio. I am sending him a copy
of this message because he does not always read all of the Stoves
Listserv messages. I suspect that he would agree with the
remainder of my message:
>>
>>Note: Your current level of activities are already advanced
because your starting point is based on the Belonio work. And
your level of questions cannot really be addressed via email
messages. What is needed is hands-on work by experienced people
with advanced equipment (at least PEMS-level measurements) with a
timetable and a budget that can cover some serious expenses by the
best people. Or go to Belonio, paying your own way and paying
something to him and the entity where he is working, and there you
will find answers with real depth.
>>
>>Opinion: An organization the size of SNV (and others) should
bring in the assistance you need, or be prepared to re-plow the
same fields (re-inventing the same wheel) that Belonio and others
have done at considerable personal expense and sacrifice.
>>
>>Technical note: I have for a long time been impressed by the
beautiful blue flames from the rice husk gasifiers. But your
materials call attention to soot deposition from these flames.
So I conclude that the blue flames from rice husk should not be
equated with the super-clean combustion with blue flames from
natural gas, LPG, biogas and alcohol. Super-clean burning is
harder to do than meets the eye that sees blue flames.
>>
>>Your work is to be commended, and encouraged to continue. But
this is serious research. And I do not normally associate SNV
with such technical research (but I could be mistaken).
Somebody needs to get this work done, and I hope that SNV and
others will put the needed resources into resolving these
important issues.
>>
>>And the studies need to address the issues of cost of a device
that is targeted to serve single households. Even when a unit
such as you are constructing is functional, it might not be
affordable or even appropriate for the HOUSEHOLD target. Maybe
for restaurants??? or for small commercial needs such as
significant heating of water for hotels, etc.???
>>
>>Dr TLUD
>>
>>Paul S. Anderson, PhD aka "Dr TLUD"
Email: psanders at ilstu.edu Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: www.drtlud.com
On 5/13/2013 8:23 PM, Tuong DoDuc wrote:
>>
>>Dear Dr.TLUD, Paul Oliver, and others,
>>>
>>>
>>>The team in SNV Vietnam is adopting the continous gasifier model developed by Belonio. The manual has been obtained from the CRHET.
>>>
>>>Watch our first propotype: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQGS-VQIj5M
>>>We were able to control the fire, load fuel without affecting the fire, and easily remove char at the bottom of the reactor.
>>>
>>>
>>>We also adopted the computer fan-casing by a cheaper, more popular fan in Vietnam (often used for coal and fixed wood stove). Fan costed 2USD (while to replicate Belonio's fan-casing, we bought the adapter for 5USD and a computer fan for 1.5USD)
>>>
>>>
>>>However, this is just our first step and we still have so many problems to fully control the fire and ease the operation.
>>>1) For instance, uncontrolled moment happened when combustion occurs rigt on top of the fuel hopper, a lot of smoke was produced and later the fire burnt the fan.
>>>https://www.dropbox.com/s/43fkjs0axuye4oj/uncontrollable_moment.jpg
>>>https://www.dropbox.com/s/rd1g1cg0a9ue8qt/fan_casing.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>>2) Another problem is that a lot of tar is produced. It deposits on pot bottom, burner and other part of the stove. That would also harm the user. An idea is to create a layer of char in the burner pipe (to filter the tar). Not tried yet.
>>>
>>>
>>>3) We observes 5-10% of the gas leaked out through the char removal door. We burnt them, but user may not know (or they simply just don't care) that it is toxic.
>>>
>>>
>>>4) One more, it is very hard to control the final minutes of the gasificatoin process. It always cause inverted combustion to the fuel hopper.
>>>
>>>
>>>By this email, I would like to ask if some of you have done similar work with continuous gasifier like this to share more experience. We can thus reduce our time and effort in localizing this technology.
>>>
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>Do Duc Tuong,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Renewable Energy Advisor
>>>SNV Vietnam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Stoves mailing list
>>
>>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
>>http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Stoves mailing list
>>
>>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
>>http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Paul A. Olivier PhD
>26/5 Phu Dong Thien Vuong
>Dalat
>Vietnam
>
>Louisiana telephone: 1-337-447-4124 (rings Vietnam)
>Mobile: 090-694-1573 (in Vietnam)
>Skype address: Xpolivier
>http://www.esrla.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Stoves mailing list
>
>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
>http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Stoves mailing list
>
>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
>http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
>
>
>
--
Paul A. Olivier PhD
26/5 Phu Dong Thien Vuong
Dalat
Vietnam
Louisiana telephone: 1-337-447-4124 (rings Vietnam)
Mobile: 090-694-1573 (in Vietnam)
Skype address: Xpolivier
http://www.esrla.com/
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20130515/6fcf4875/attachment.html>
More information about the Stoves
mailing list