[Stoves] planting trees ( the way I'd do it 1, 000, 000, 000 years from n...
Carefreeland at aol.com
Carefreeland at aol.com
Fri Nov 15 04:03:33 CST 2013
Teddy,
I have read the article provided and found your production levels with
native acacia to be quite amazing. Correct me if I am wrong. After doing
some math with your numbers, am I correct? 1 kg = 2.2 lbs, 1 short ton =
2000 lbs. Divide acerage harvets production number by 6 years to get result.
You are producing 2.2 short tons per acre/ per year of
charcoal.
Reversing the equation. 2.2 tons charcoal at 30% conversion rate = 7.3
tons of acacia produced per acre, per year, in 6 harvest cycle.
Is this correct?
Wow. Here in Ohio USA we only figure on 1-2 tons wood per acre, per
year, with typical hardwood scrub overgrowth harvested for fireplace logs
maybe every 20- 30 years.
I want to see what happens when we start to coppice black locust like
you do. My question is,will our numbers be as good?
If we use your numbers, a blast furance using 1000 tons of charcoal
per day ( to use a round number) would need 165,000 acres in charcoal
production to keep up with demand. Still a lot of acerage to smelt maybe 1000
tons of iron per day. When that production is first used as building lumber,
and then recycled into fuel, it does not seem so intimidating. In that case
the tranmsportation and harvesting costs are already paid for with the
first life cycle of the wood.
A study done 10 years ago, stated that we burry 1,000,000 tons of wood
per year in landfills in only a 3 county area here around Dayton, Ohio.
That wood, converted to charcoal at 30% conversion rate, would yield 300,000
tons of charcoal per year, Almost the same amount of production figured
above. Some fuel for thought.
Keep up the great work.
Dan Dimiduk
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Cookswell Jikos
<_cookswelljikos at gmail.com_ (mailto:cookswelljikos at gmail.com) > wrote:
OK.... as discouraging as the facts may be, the facts are reality, and
they must be dealt with to avoid future problems.
1: Can different species be grown, that have higher Mean Annual Increments
of growth?
Yes - at least in East African drylands - the traditional colonial methods
of silviculture were focused on high land pine and cypress plantations not
indigenous dry land adapted trees. (which now provides the feedstock for
more of Kenyas charcoal) Since 1994 we have been experimenting with
different dryland planting and agronomic techniques (please see
http://www.acts.or.ke/dmdocuments/PROJECT_REPORTS/PISCES_Sustainable_Charcoal.pdf pg. 7) and
most of our findings so far have led us to belive that endimic tree species
managed in a holistic and permacutrual manner produce coppiced 'branch'
charcoal with an excellent life cycle analysis profile.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20131115/151d1159/attachment.html>
More information about the Stoves
mailing list