[Stoves] Two Stove System - typos corrected v1.1

[Frank Shields]

Dear Crispin,


Thanks for the four page work sheet as it makes it very clear as to what values need to be obtained and how they are formulated - and the definition of the names they are called. Very helpful to me. 

Now the devil is in the details of getting these values without resorting to using too many ‘known’ book values that replace good testing. 

Are you working on test procedures?

Regards

Frank

Frank Shields


  




> On Nov 29, 2015, at 2:31 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott <crispinpigott at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> In a word, yes. This is part of the testing context. To provide a confident prediction of future performance, the testing context should match the context of use.
>  
> >…what is being talked about for the other considerations about fuel that make a big difference regarding combustion? Like size distribution, shape, rate of adding fuel to the stove, bark covered, rounds or split, old dense wood or young saplings etc. etc. Is there a plan to use ‘like fuel’ to represent a specific area? Seems important to me. 
>  
> Thanks 
>  
> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20151129/b9217f2f/attachment.html>