[Stoves] [Another attack on solid fuels

[Frans Peeters]

Karin Troncoso
Onderwerp: Re: [Stoves] [Stoves Digest, Vol 81, Issue 21] Another attack on solid fuels by public health adventurers

 

Dear Karin

s: 277–714 μg/m3 or 11–28 fold higher than the WHO recommendation of 25 μg/m3;)”

 

The current discussion 

 

We need a reboot on this whole matter. There are far too many things assumed being given the status of ‘truth’.  I suggest the main reason for the reboot is because there is a lot of money being directed, or redirected, based on really poor quality information and guesses. I appreciate that you are making measurements and creating a base upon which to construct a more realistic version of reality. 

Crispin

 

DEARS

 

     If you need  a new look ?

Stop discussions and make a law  << ANNY STOVE MUST HAVE A CHIMNEY >> .

You discussed 50 years . Sigarets good for LUNG CANCER ?   

 7/ 1000  get smoke cancer and cost the community  300 000 $ / per STUPID FUMER .

For the POOR give them >10$ good for 3m STOOFPIPE 120 mm.

For the clever :  the ants make ventilated hills of a few meters high; and you ?

Hollow mud works too……

 

     I got cancer from CO2 in bottle drinking water  after 10 years ! USOFAGUS do not resist HCl from stomac acid bloating from liberated CO2 .   Mind all bubble drinks .

Worked in world its dangerouest plant ,with air  absolute filters of 30 000 $ each ,to7 fans of  2m diam.  Chimney  10m diam.  80 meter high .

Most advanced particle spectra  measurements .   Separating natural from man made .

 

Regards                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

F.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20170808/331a79ff/attachment.html>