[Stoves] benefits from reduced indoor air pollution.

Andrew Heggie aj.heggie at gmail.com
Sat Oct 14 07:56:32 CDT 2017


I've changed the subject from the thread where I took Cripin's quote
from to try and shift the discussion to more technical matters

On 14 October 2017 at 00:47, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott
<crispinpigott at outlook.com> wrote:

>
> ‎The Kyrgyzstan winter stove pilot proved beyond doubt that getting the
> smoke outside, alternatively not making as much and getting it outside,
> reduces personal exposure, a conclusion reached without modelling any
> kitchens or dispersion. It also showed that men have higher exposure to
> PM2.5 than either children or women and benefited the most from the
> improved stoves and installations.

Firstly is there any reason given for men's higher exposure? Perceived
wisdom is that young children were more at risk (at a given level of
exposure) as their immune systems were naive  plus presumably their
cell divisions are more active and hence open to more chance of
disruption.

Anyway does anyone think that the recent US EPA step 2 rules for
pollutant emissions via chimneys/flues venting outside are at all
relevant as a target for stoves?

They seem to be independent of thermal power  in that they accepts
2-2.5 grams particulates per cubic meter irrespective of heat
liberated and also susceptible to dilution or have I missed something?




More information about the Stoves mailing list