[Stoves] ***SPAM*** Re: [tluds] update on the TLUD

[Ronal Larson]

Kirk and list:

	At 
		https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0_R9Tfvs4w <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0_R9Tfvs4w>
the salesperson for the stovetec superpot demonstrates boiling water in 15-17 minutes using 4 sticks.   Can you add anything about the comparison with your 7.5 minutes.  You of course had much higher power level - but he could have also.

	He had a nice amount of charcoal left. - too bad he didn’t report on the amount .  Can you add anything on your char production, with your

	The super pot shows the value of a skirt.  Can you add more about how much faster the boil occurred with the super pot and your 5’ of pellets?  

	Can you gin uo a low cost skirt for your regular pot - and guesstimate the cost and energy savings?


	Below your message  below on the 24th is another important message on the 23rd to this list just on pressure issues with your stove.  That duplicated a message on the stove list on the 20th.   Therefore I am sending this message also to the stoves list and will add a few comments later today on those two messages. 
	 I consider them very important because they talk about pressure differences - which we can learn a lot from and I think this may be the first such report..

Ron
	

> On Mar 24, 2021, at 8:19 PM, Kirk Harris <gkharris316 at comcast.net <mailto:gkharris316 at comcast.net>> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Today I tested the stove with high-power forced primary air.  The 5 inch fuel reactor chamber, with aprox. 5" height of soft wood pellets, brought 5 liters of water to a rolling boil, in a standard SSM Super Pot without the lid, from 16 degrees C, in 7.5 minutes.  The setting was 6 on the adjustment valve as the 9 setting was to high and flames started coming out of the annulus between the combustor and fuel reactor.  The super pot does this because it creates more flow resistance than the simple pot I had been using.  Then the stove was turned down to the natural draft setting of 1, where it was stable and there was no smell of hydrocarbons.
> 
> The stove is working quite well,
> 
> Kirk H.
> 
> On 3/23/2021 11:11 AM, Kirk Harris wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> Attached is a write-up on the stove I have been experimenting with over the last several years.  I tried to put it on the stove discussion list, but it was flagged as spam and so it must have ended up in every ones spam folder.
>> 
>> Kirk H.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> https://www.avg.com <https://www.avg.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#104): https://Biochar.groups.io/g/tluds/message/104
> Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/81557543/3503653
> Group Owner: tluds+owner at Biochar.groups.io
> Unsubscribe: https://Biochar.groups.io/g/tluds/leave/9337411/3503653/827832023/xyzzy [rongretlarson at comcast.net]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20210326/838a068b/attachment.html>