<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Paal,</div><div>Good points all but you know what: Let the most practical solution win---as determined by the actual user. I have ultimate faith in that (and not enough patience or time for the debate) myself.</div><div>By the way I wanted to send my condolences for the recent tragedy</div><div>In Norway. I am just as impressed to the positive about how it is being assessed and handled wisely by those concerned--unlike perhaps the knee jerk reactions to our own 911 here.</div><div><br></div><div>Kind regards, </div><div>Richard</div><div><br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On Aug 12, 2011, at 2:07 AM, "Paal wendelbo" <<a href="mailto:paaw@online.no">paaw@online.no</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<div><font size="2" face="Arial">Georg and stovers
<p style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US" lang="EN-US"><font face="Calibri">Biochar has come to be, no doubt about that, and
what happen in Cambia is what will happen allover as long as you have charcoal
fans like Crispin and others. People are desperate for money. The low prices of
charcoal will lead to more use of forest, probably short time cheaper
household energy, but also competition about the resources for production of
charcoal. The women of Richards will loose their material for making briquettes
with the enormous quantities char needed for soil improvement.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US" lang="EN-US"><font face="Calibri"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1">
</span><span style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </span>Taken into consideration the
fact, the losses of combustible gases lost by production of charcoal,
could nearby cover the need of household energy for people using charcoal for
cooking. By changing to charcoal-producing TLUD stoves, whatever Crispin will
try to tell us, you will utilize this gases for cooking and in addition have
about 20% char left, which could go back to soil improvement.
<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US" lang="EN-US"><font face="Calibri"><span style="mso-tab-count: 1">
</span>You would have a win/win situation. By changing from charcoal to TLUD,
you will have more energy, better health, higher agriculture yields, forest
conservation , more jobs, better household economy. What more do you
ned?</font></span></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US" lang="EN-US"><font face="Calibri">With regrds Paal
W</font></span></p></font></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Stoves mailing list</span><br><span></span><br><span>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address</span><br><span><a href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page</span><br><span><a href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:</span><br><span><a href="http://www.bioenergylists.org/">http://www.bioenergylists.org/</a></span><br><span></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>