<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Cecil,<br>
      Don't I know it. I built the ultimate pellet heating and cooking
      stove while living with its ultimate users. The design rocks,
      perfect combustion, no moving parts, no electricity required,
      cooking surface low to the ground, just like I see in all the
      pictures. Do you think my wife will use it? Next time..... I'll
      have to talk to her about it .... first.<br>
      <br>
      Cheers:)<br>
      <br>
      Isolated Alex<br>
      <br>
      PS. .....maybe it doesn't produce enough char.....<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 22/01/2013 4:49 AM, Cecil Cook wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CA+1hLhaYtynCBdnjq+AWOeYF=TjfAU-J8HAgWDo82i+kKVZGgQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">Dear
              Pual, Kevin, Crispin, Marc, and kindred stovers,</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">I am a
              much backslid applied anthropologists who took a 30 year
              side trip into
              appropriate technology in South Africa at the instigation
              of Crispin.  Now
              a days Crispin is still misleading me by asking me to
              assist him and the World
              Bank design, test, produce, and market ever more perfect
              low cost biomass
              stoves in places like Ulaanbataar  in Mongolia, Yogyakarta
              in Java, and
              most recently Battambang in Cambodia.  With fiendish
              friends like Crispin,
              who needs enemies?</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">Kevin's
              comic stories about the idiot savant who is very good at
              drawing circles around
              bullet holes is unfortunately a hilarious metaphor for the
              multiple problems
              and predicaments that stove scientists, inventors and
              enthusiasts typically
              create for themselves when they (we?) try to innovate ever
              more perfect biomass
              burning stoves for imagined and therefore voiceless stove
              customers.  </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">I
              recently discovered there is a significant market in
              Central Java for big
              portable charcoal stoves so that neighbours can come
              together to prepare food
              in a sequence of 7 memorials for deceased family members
              (the last feast or
              party  comes 1000 days after a loved one dies).  As an act
              of
              solidarity, families, neighbours and friends get together
              outside in courtyards
              and alleyways to cook big pots of food that is eaten by
              the living in honour of
              the recently deceased.  I have not observed one of these
              memorial services
              but many families in the city informed me they have a big
              charcoal or wood
              burning stove that mainly gets used for these parties for
              the dead and for
              weddings, or by small food vendors who prepare food for
              sale to passersby or
              also by caterers and in the kitchens of restaurants ...
              otherwise these big
              stoves are simply stored in a corner.  Families estimated
              they use their
              big stoves about one to two times a month.  </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">It would
              theoretically be possible to figure out what percentage of
              the biomass fuels
              entering the urban economy of Yogyakarta city in Central
              Java are devoted to
              staying on good terms of with spirits of the deceased and
              the in-laws.
               Who but an inquisitive anthropologist would bother to
              isolate large
              portable biomass stoves used for these important social
              ceremonies to
              memorialize the dead and celebrate weddings as a potential
              market segment of
              the stove buying public that needs be studied, understood,
              and perhaps is
              important enough to merit the design of a biomass stove
              that meets their
              socio-economic needs.</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">In the
              case of cooking for the dead and the in-laws, we are
              talking here about
              millions of biomass stoves that are mostly, but not
              exclusively, used for big
              social ceremonies in Indonesia where there are perhaps a
              100 million biomass
              stoves in used with a replacement rate of perhaps 100
              million stoves a year at
              a cost of $1 to $2 each which is the going market value of
              a traditional
              artisan made stove).  The traditional stove economy of
              Indonesia is vast
              and highly differentiated between a number of different -
              somewhat specialized
              - market segments with different needs, interests and
              amounts of money to
              spend.</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">The
              informal approach that Crispin and I have used for many
              years is for us to
              spend a day or two together with a typical low income
              family and go through a
              cooking day together.  While Crispin is focused on stoves,
              the pots used,
              the sequencing of tasks and cooking cycles, I take time to
              walk around the
              village or neighbourhood meeting the fuel sellers and
              stove vendors in the
              nearby markets to get an idea about the stove and fuel
              supply chains, the mark
              ups added to the retail value by the time a stove or 1 kg
              bag or charcoal or a
              small bundle of wood is purchased by a low income
              household.  One thing we
              have discovered in Malawi, DRC, Mozambique, Zambia, and
              now Mongolia,
              Indonesia, and Cambodia that the bottom 1/3 to 1/2 of
              these households survive
              on tiny daily cash flows of less than a couple of dollars.
               The difference
              in cost between a $1 to $2 stove and a $4 stove is huge.
               Think about your
              response to a doubling of the cost of any big ticket
              durable consumer item that
              you have come to depend on in your daily life like a car,
              or refrigerator or a
              gas stove!</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">What
              normally happens when Crispin and I come face to face with
              the social and
              economic reality of an urban or village household is that
              Crispin's inventive
              mind is stimulated when it confronts the 'otherness' of a
              particular culture of
              stove-fuel use which includes the traditional ways that
              people, both men and
              women, operate their stoves and combine different types of
              biomass fuels to get
              the performances they want from their stoves. They know a
              lot about economizing
              scarce fuels when they are running out of money and/or
              fuel. He can’t help
              himself. Crispin has an uncontrollable urge to innovate
              improvement in stove products
              as he encounters them in their cultural contexts.  This
              same process
              continues when Crispin sits down with a traditional stove
              maker and comes to
              terms with his knowhow and his or her technical, resource
              and financial
              constraints. It is human, engaged, and face to face!</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">This is
              beginning of a real, culturally contextualized AT design
              process: Crispin as
              stove scientist is challenged by me and indigenous stove
              users and stove makers
              to reconfigure himself into a practical engineer who
              accepts responsibility for
              converting his universal knowledge about combustion, heat
              transfer, and biomass
              energy into forms that will be understood and used by a
              semi-literate and
              pre-scientific artisan stove maker.  The blessing of AT is
              the
              democratization of the power and the benefits of an
              increasingly planetary
              system of science and technology that comes about when we
              succeed in translating
              this S&T into de-mystified forms that can be
              understood and creatively applied
              by artisan stove makers, who know how to produce a very
              cheap $1 to $2 stove
              (which the stove scientist does not know how to pull
              off!).  But, the indigenous stove producer does not
              know much about PM, the role of primary and secondary air
              flows and finding the
              right balance, how to get the right amount of Excess Air
              flowing through a
              stove, and how to maximize heat transfer between the fire
              and the pot.
               Crispin needs to learn from the indigenous stove makers
              how he earns a
              living making his traditional stove for 1 to 2 dollars and
              in that way dominates
              the stove market and how the household stove users
              operates a traditional stove
              to get the performance wanted out of it. It is Crispin’s
              and mostly my job as a
              stove anthropologist to learn enough so that we can read
              and begin operating
              within the cultural (ethno-science), behavioural and
              organizational system of
              traditional stoves and therefore figure out where the best
              places are to begin
              introducing changes into the traditional
              operator-stove-stove maker/vendor-fuel
              producer economy.       </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">I agree
              totally with you that idiot stove scientists are drawing
              circles around their
              shots into the dark unknown of the traditional
              operator-stove-fuel economy.
               If we continue to privilege the stove scientist and the
              imagined brave
              new stoves he hopes will liberate humanity from pollution
              (PM), asthma,
              and the daily grind of gathering firewood, and persist in
              using his
              western style 'ethno-science' to test the performance of
              ‘improved’ stoves to
              identify the best performers by his stove science centered
              criteria we will
              simply continue to fail in our mission to bring the
              multiple benefits of
              science to the villagers and urban survivalists struggling
              at the Bottom of the
              Pryamid This approach is hopelessly techno-centric and
              technocratic in
              perspective and ultimately doomed to failure because
              justifies the imposition
              by the World Bank and USAID and well meaning national
              government of improved
              stoves costing $10 to $30 each on villagers and urban
              residents who survive on
              less than $1 per person per day.</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">We can do
              better, much better than this, and I believe that Crispin
              and I have done and
              continue to do better by helping stove scientists enter
              the mind and heart of
              indigenous stove users and producers and discovering how
              to
              practically empower stove producers with a fundamental
              grasp of the applied
              science of high performance stoves.  When
              that happens, indigenous stove producers and vendors gain
              the practical
              knowledge they need to produce a much improved $3 or $4
              stove.  A stove that costs two times more than the
              industry standard is still within the reach of most stove
              buyers the world over.  A Chinese manufactured StoveTec
              rocket stove
              that sells for about $30 here in South Africa is
              ridiculously out of reach to
              local users of biomass stove, including the three stoned
              fire.   </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">The last
              point I will share before I totter and totally fall off my
              soap box is that we
              must develop our stove performance testing protocols
              around the culturally and
              economically appropriate performance criteria that
              presently guide the behaviours
              and economic choices of stove buyers in particular market
              segments.  It is also necessity to penetrate the
              cultural, social and economic worlds of the stove makers
              and stove vendors to
              full understand why the  existing
              stove-fuel economy is dominated by $1 to $2 stoves and how
              these value chains
              operate. The traditional operator-stove-fuel system must
              be allowed to sit in
              judgement of the mad hatter stove designer who are
              beginning to control of
              hundreds of millions of development funds for the
              improvement of traditional
              stoves... not the reverse. </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">When it
              is possible for stove scientists - who passionately debate
              on the bio-energy
              discussion list - to innovate Improved Stoves with
              superior emissions and
              system efficiency performances that only cost $3 to $4
              biomass and that
              continue to meet all of the critical socio-cultural
              performance requirements of
              the existing traditional stove then I will be doing back
              flips with Father
              William to celebrate their accomplishments. 
              As an engineer shy anthropologist who has waited patiently
              off stage for
              the stove scientists and hardware experts to recognize the
              short coming of the technology
              centered approach, I am eager to participate with them to
              create an inclusive multi-disciplinary
              and multi-stakeholder approach to the in situ design and
              development of improved
              stoves.</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">I am
              eager to take my hat off and salute stove scientists and
              engineers for
              rededicating themselves to the transcendental objectives
              of humanity
              serving appropriate science and technology: what did
              Fuller call it? Ah yes, I
              remember, it is his more-for-less principle which enables
              a mature technology
              to become ever more spirit like.  Bucky called it the
              'ephemeralization'
              of science whereby a mature technology requires less and
              less energy and
              material to perform a given function like computing,
              communicating, or cooking.  </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"">May I
              recommend that stovers take a good look at what
              Geres/Cambodia has accomplished
              to date over 16 years with a stove improvement strategy
              that concentrates on
              gradually improving the designs, materials, and production
              methods of the
              producers and distributional methods of the vendors of
              traditional stoves, and
              not on the primary stove buyer, the stove technology
              itself,
              and certainly not the stove scientists.  </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222;background:white">Here
              is the url  <</span><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif""><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.geres.eu/en/studies/122-publi-etude-nls"
                target="_blank"><span style="color:#1155cc">http://www.geres.eu/en/studies/122-publi-etude-nls</span></a><span
                style="color:#222222;background:white">> for an
                important review of the
                process that Geres went through in its capacity as a
                facilitator of baseline
                research and institution builder that transformed the
                traditional Lao bucket
                charcoal burning stove into the 'new Lao' improved
                cookstove which is today
                produced and distributed by 35 small stove making
                enterprises who between them
                produce and sell more than 25 000 NL stoves every month.
                 There are many
                useful lessons in this</span><span style="color:#222222"> <i>in
                  situ</i><span style="background:white"> stove
                  development strategy which the Geres team
                  systematically followed in Cambodia.  They decided to
                  maximize the use of
                  the the:</span></span></span></p>
          <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin:0cm 0cm
            0.0001pt 54pt"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">1.<span
                style="font-size:7pt;font-family:'Times New Roman'">     
              </span></span><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">traditional
              stove technologies, </span></p>
          <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0cm 0cm
            0.0001pt
            54pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">2.<span
                style="font-size:7pt;font-family:'Times New Roman'">     
              </span></span><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">stove
              operating skills and knowledge base of particular groups
              of stove
              users,</span></p>
          <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin:0cm 0cm
            0.0001pt
            54pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">3.<span
                style="font-size:7pt;font-family:'Times New Roman'">     
              </span></span><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">indigenous
              know how and business of producers of the traditional Lao
              stove, and</span></p>
          <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"
            style="margin-left:54pt;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">4.<span
                style="font-size:7pt;font-family:'Times New Roman'">     
              </span></span><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">existing
              network of wholesalers and retailers of stoves.</span></p>
          <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"
            style="margin-left:54pt;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222"> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">They have
              also minimized any disruption to this pre-existing
              traditional
              system of producing, distributing and selling the Lao
              bucket charcoal stove by
              incrementally improving the design, materials, production,
              training, and
              distribution of the various 'traditional' role players in
              the
              stove+operator+producer+vendor+fuel supply chain economy.
            </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222"> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">I think we
              stove scientists, social science facilitators, funding
              agents, and development policy makers, stove producers,
              etc. need to carefully
              assess the relevance of the Geres Improved Cookstove
              Program for how to
              incrementally develop improved 'traditional' stoves that
              are able to compete
              with $1 to $2 stoves that dominate the stove markets of
              most
              developing countries.    </span><span
              style="font-size:12pt;font-family:'Times New Roman',serif"></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222"> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;background-color:white;background-repeat:initial
            initial"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif";color:#222222">It may also
              useful to review the Genes led Global Stove Program <<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.geres.eu/en/geres-cambodia"
                target="_blank"><span style="color:#1155cc">http://www.geres.eu/en/geres-cambodia</span></a>>
which
              lays out a 5 year strategy to share the lessons learned by
              the Cambodian
              Improved Cookstove Program with other national stove
              initiatives in SEAsia and
              French speaking West Africa. </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times
              New Roman","serif""> </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times
              New Roman","serif"">In service,</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times
              New Roman","serif"">Cecil Cook</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times
              New Roman","serif"">TechnoShare</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span
              style="font-size:12.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Times
              New Roman","serif"">South Africa</span></p>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Kevin
          <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:kchisholm@ca.inter.net" target="_blank">kchisholm@ca.inter.net</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
              <div><font face="Arial">Dear Paul</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Once upon a time, a Traveller was
                  driving along through a rural District. He noticed
                  that most stop signs, Billboards, Barn Doors, etc were
                  shot full of bullet holes, but that the bullet holes
                  were in the exact center of every circle! He was
                  amazed at the shooting accuracy, and stopped at the
                  local Barber Shop to find out the identity of the
                  Marksman. When he inquired of the Barber, the Barber
                  replied:</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">"That's the Village Idiot. He
                  shoots first and draws the circle after."</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">This silly little story contains
                  an important lesson: </font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial" size="4">"When wishing to develop
                  a new product, first find what The Market wants, and
                  then build The Product around it."</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">The Patent Literature abounds with
                  brilliant solutions to problems that the World does
                  not want solved. They "help the Little Old Lady to
                  cross the street, when she does not want to cross the
                  street." Many of the Inventors of such products end up
                  broke and disillusioned. </font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">As it relates to stoves, what does
                  Fatima in Egypt, Michelle in Haiti, Joe Pattagoniak's
                  Wife in an Inuktatuck Igloo or Mohammed's Wife in a
                  Grass Hut in Timbuktu want in a stove? Obviously,
                  different stoves are required for different
                  applications. </font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">So, we can configure clever stoves
                  that turn our creative cranks and are fun to make, and
                  we can develop our own testing procedures that show
                  how clever our clever stoves are, and with such
                  carefully structured tests, we can prove that "My
                  clever stove is more clever than your clever stove."
                  How does that tie in with what Fatima et al, AKA "The
                  Market", wants? </font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">If the test is based on the time
                  to boil a covered pot, but the Customer uses an
                  uncovered pot... fail. If the Customer uses a covered
                  pot, but the test uses an open pot... fail. If the
                  Customer wants heat loss to the living space, and the
                  test penalizes stove shell loss... fail. </font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Some forms of "Improved Stove"
                  represent the kind of progress one gets when one moves
                  the outhouse closer to the back door in the Winter,
                  and further away in the summer. We can build a stove
                  venting into the living space that has "an 80%
                  reduction in CO, Tars, BC, and ash emissions" and call
                  it an "Improved stove." Such stoves will kill people
                  living in Homes built to First World standards.
                  Certainly, there are Markets for which such stoves are
                  appropriate, but when tests are structured to require
                  ALL stoves to meet the requirements of a small section
                  of the total stove market, then progress in the
                  remainder of the</font><font face="Arial"> Market is
                  seriously retarded.</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">A stove producing char is fabulous
                  when the Customer wants char, but when the Customer
                  does not want char, it is a fail. A stove that boils
                  water quickly is great if one wants to sterilize
                  water, but it is a fail if the Customer wants to bake
                  bread, or to simmer a stew for 2 hours without having
                  to attend the stove every 10-15 minutes.  What is the
                  purpose of a "Stove"? What does the Customer want it
                  to do? Perhaps the Customer wants an "Improved 3 stone
                  fire that burns 5/7 as much wood, so that she doesn't
                  have to find wood on the weekend? The main
                  requirements of a stove are:</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">1: It cooks food and/or heats the
                  living space</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">2: It is fuel efficient.</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">3: Products of combustion do not
                  harm the Occupants of the living space.</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Why aren't stoves rated on the
                  basis of:</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">1: ... grams of fuel to cook the
                  food or foods for which the stove was designed?</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">2: ... stove heat loss to the
                  living space?</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">3: ... whether or not the level of
                  products of combustion within the living space were
                  acceptable or not.</font> </div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Certainly, other "stove factors"
                  are important, such as initial cost, life, expected
                  life, etc, but dealing with the above factors in a way
                  that was meaningful to the Customer would certainly be
                  helpful. </font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">There is a Classic Story about the
                  Drunk crawling along in the gutter one night,  under a
                  streetlight. </font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">The Cop asks "What are you doing"?
                </font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Drunk says:  "I lost my cell phone
                  and am looking for it." </font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Cop asks: "Where did you lose it?"</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Drunk says: "On the other side of
                  the street."</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Cop asks: "Why are you looking
                  here?"</font></div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Drunk says: "Because there is more
                  light here."</font> </div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">I see interesting parallels in
                  stove testing... the tests seem to be set up to give
                  results that are easy to attain in "The Lab", but
                  which are not necessarily reflective of conditions
                  that are important to the Customer in "The Field".</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">In theory, it is very easy to get
                  Grant Money... all the Applicant has to do is show the
                  Donor that he is the best person to do what the Donor
                  wants done. If a Donor favours a particular
                  Technology, then that particular technology gets
                  favoured. If the Donor favours a business at a
                  particular state of development, then that is the
                  "business state" that will be favoured. Donors don't
                  so much support a given technology, or a state of
                  business development, but rather, they support a
                  "total situation that is most likely to get done what
                  the donor wants done." Clearly, if the Donor wants
                  "Job ABC" done, and the Applicant is superb at "Job
                  XYZ", then the Applicant will not get funded. </font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Best wishes,</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <div><font face="Arial">Kevin</font></div>
              <div> </div>
              <blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT:#000000 2px
solid;PADDING-LEFT:5px;PADDING-RIGHT:0px;MARGIN-LEFT:5px;MARGIN-RIGHT:0px">
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div style="FONT:10pt arial">----- Original Message
                      ----- </div>
                    <div style="FONT:10pt arial;BACKGROUND:#e4e4e4"><b>From:</b>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        title="psanders@ilstu.edu"
                        href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu" target="_blank">Paul
                        Anderson</a> </div>
                    <div style="FONT:10pt arial"><b>To:</b> <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        title="stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org"
                        href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org"
                        target="_blank">Discussion of biomass cooking
                        stoves</a> </div>
                    <div style="FONT:10pt arial"><b>Cc:</b> <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        title="wastemin1@verizon.net"
                        href="mailto:wastemin1@verizon.net"
                        target="_blank">Hugh McLaughlin</a> ; <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        title="solarbobky@yahoo.com"
                        href="mailto:solarbobky@yahoo.com"
                        target="_blank">Bob Fairchild</a> </div>
                    <div style="FONT:10pt arial"><b>Sent:</b> Monday,
                      January 21, 2013 9:51 AM</div>
                    <div style="FONT:10pt arial"><b>Subject:</b>
                      [Stoves] Example of missed opportunities was Re:
                      is this new?</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Crispin and all,<br>
                      <br>
                      Good comments by Alex and Marc and Crispin are
                      below about air flows in TLUDs.<br>
                      <br>
                      All should note that Paal Wendelbo's Peko Pe TLUD
                      has had some side-holes in the fuel chamber wall
                      for 2 decades.  Not as much "early secondary air"
                      as Crispin's Vesto.   And Paul Wever has them in
                      his "stove pipe stove".  <br>
                      <br>
                      My experiments with them were not conclusive about
                      any advantage, so I have opted to not use them,
                      partly to have less work in fabrication (no extra
                      holes to make) and partly because the entering air
                      enters as PRIMARY AIR when the fuel bed is above
                      the level of each hole, which translates into less
                      control.   I will probably re-visit this topic
                      when time and funds permit.<br>
                      <br>
                      MAIN POINT:  This is a great example of missed
                      opportunities because there has never been
                      seriously funded research on the multitude of
                      controllable variables in TLUD stoves!!!   We can
                      see the possible variations.  But we cannot prove
                      them one way or the other simply by funding them
                      out of the pocketbooks of Paal, Paul, Crispin and
                      others.  YEARS AGO we should have resolved the
                      issues of the Vesto stove being operated as a
                      TLUD, or as a different type of stove.   The Peko
                      Pe features should be better understood.   As
                      should the issues of Nurhuda's stove, and
                      Belonio's, and Anderson's and others.  Even people
                      who have resisted TLUD technology for years are
                      becoming involved and still there is nearly zero
                      coordination.  And any financial support seems to
                      be by-passing the people with experience with
                      micro-gasifiers, and instead is seeking isolated
                      academic modelling that (I suspect) will take
                      years to have academic results.  So be it, but
                      let's also give some funds to the practitioners. <br>
                      <br>
                      <u>With all due respect</u> for the need for
                      proper "technology neutral" distribution of
                      funding, I am getting very tired of "technology
                      neutral" that gives equal (or more) weight to
                      giving money (big money) to "business-ready"
                      operations that can start cranking out stoves to
                      be counted toward the 100 million by 2020. 
                      Instead, the leading technology for lowest
                      emissions from solid-fuel cookstoves is TLUD (and
                      other micro-gasification), and it is not yet
                      getting BASIC support that is needed.  <br>
                      <br>
                      This is how it looks from my vantage point.  I
                      hope that the above is a "reasoned statement", not
                      a "rant."  And I am forever an optimist and have
                      hopes that the  situation will improve.<br>
                      <br>
                      I look forward to seeing many of you at ETHOS in
                      Seattle and/or at the GACC Forum in Cambodia.<br>
                      <br>
                      Paul<br>
                      <br>
                      *************<br>
                      Alex English wrote:<br>
                      <blockquote type="cite">Crispin,<br>
                        Its been a while since I saw the Vesto. It looks
                        from the pictures like there are secondary air
                        holes all the way up the central tube. Is that
                        current?<br>
                        Seems like the top rows would just be adding
                        tramp air (unemployed air).<br>
                        <br>
                        Alex<br>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br>
                      <pre cols="72">Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD"
Email:  <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu" target="_blank">psanders@ilstu.edu</a>   Skype: paultlud  Phone: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B1-309-452-7072" value="+13094527072" target="_blank">+1-309-452-7072</a>
Website:  <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.drtlud.com" target="_blank">www.drtlud.com</a></pre>
                      On 1/20/2013 9:06 PM, Marc Pare wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite">That cutaway is beautiful!
                      Great example of "let the product speak for
                      itself"
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>Since seeing counterflow in action, I
                        understand exactly what you're describing with
                        the air flows. </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>I didn't understand your emphasis on keeping
                        the flame near the bed with a "descending
                        burner" until this paragraph:
                        <div>
                          <div><br>
                          </div>
                          <blockquote style="BORDER-BOTTOM:medium
                            none;BORDER-LEFT:medium
                            none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0px;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px
                            40px;PADDING-LEFT:0px;PADDING-RIGHT:0px;BORDER-TOP:medium
                            none;BORDER-RIGHT:medium
                            none;PADDING-TOP:0px">
                            <div><span
style="color:rgb(31,73,125);font-size:14px;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">The
                                secondary air is send across the surface
                                to keep a deck of flame going at the
                                height of the holes. This obviates the
                                need for adding a circular disk at the
                                top to ’keep the flame going’. Adding a
                                ‘concentrator’ as Paul calls it takes
                                more material and moves the fire too far
                                away from the heat of the pyrolysis bed
                                leading to unwanted flame-outs from time
                                to time. </span></div>
                          </blockquote>
                          <div><br clear="all">
                            <div>I've seen these instabilities quite
                              often in small-scale pyrolyzers. Great to
                              see a practical measure to prevent their
                              tendency to "smoke bomb".</div>
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>What's on the "to-do" list for this
                              class of design, Crispin? Are you looking
                              to push it into other applications? Apply
                              the principles to improve existing design?
                              (like you mentioned with advancing the
                              Anglo SupraNova)</div>
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>Marc Paré<br>
                              B.S. Mechanical Engineering<br>
                              Georgia Institute of Technology |
                              Université de Technologie de Compiègne<br>
                              <br>
                              my cv, etc. | <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                href="http://notwandering.com"
                                target="_blank">http://notwandering.com</a></div>
                            <br>
                            <br>
                            <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 21,
                              2013 at 9:42 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott
                              <span dir="ltr"><<a
                                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="mailto:crispinpigott@gmail.com"
                                  target="_blank">crispinpigott@gmail.com</a>></span>
                              wrote:<br>
                              <blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT:#ccc 1px
                                solid;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px
                                0.8ex;PADDING-LEFT:1ex"
                                class="gmail_quote">
                                <div vlink="purple" link="blue"
                                  lang="EN-CA">
                                  <div>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Dear
                                        Marc and Ron and All interested
                                        in air flows</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt"></span> </p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">This
                                        is a response to questions about
                                        air and Marc’s tube.</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt"></span> </p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Here
                                        is an old photo of secondary air
                                        entering the combustion chamber
                                        of a Vesto pushing the flame to
                                        the centre. This accomplishes
                                        the following:</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt"></span> </p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Keeps
                                        the fire away from the wall,
                                        reducing the temperature it has
                                        to survive (a lot)</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Keeps
                                        the flame going</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Not
                                        allowing it to spread to one
                                        side away from the smoke on the
                                        other side that might otherwise
                                        ‘get away’.</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Provides
                                        turbulent mixing of flame, hot
                                        secondary air and smoke</span></p>
                                    <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                                        style="FONT-FAMILY:'Calibri','sans-serif';COLOR:#1f497d;FONT-SIZE:11pt">Allows
                                        for preheating to a significant
                                        degree (250-500 C)</span><br>
                                    </p>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </blockquote>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                    See Crispin's message at the Stoves Listserv
                    archives.<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <p> </p>
                <hr>
                <div> _______________________________________________<br>
                  Stoves mailing list<br>
                  <br>
                  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org"
                    target="_blank">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
                  <br>
                  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the
                  web page<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org"
                    target="_blank">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
                  <br>
                  for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information
                  see our web site:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://www.bioenergylists.org/"
                    target="_blank">http://www.bioenergylists.org/</a><br>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Stoves mailing list<br>
            <br>
            to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org"
              target="_blank">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
            <br>
            to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org"
              target="_blank">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br>
            <br>
            for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see
            our web site:<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.bioenergylists.org/" target="_blank">http://www.bioenergylists.org/</a><br>
            <br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org</a>

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.bioenergylists.org/">http://www.bioenergylists.org/</a>

</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>