<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0mm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0mm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0mm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-CA link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Dear Ron<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>You will like this. You can create any tool you like for measuring anything you like as long it will pass peer review. Once it has been accepted as valid and uses valid metrics and acceptable definitions, it can be used to conduct approved tests. If it can be conducted simultaneously with other tests, no problem. You can report both results.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>If your metric is mass of char per dry mass of input fuel, for example, that could give a mass-related metric (a fuel production efficiency). A better metric might be energy output in the form of char divided by the energy available in the input raw material. That would be a form of energy efficiency in the secondary fuel.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>There are a set of definitions (with many clearly stated ‘efficiencies’) so when it comes time to define the metrics and describe the testing tool, the protocol should be written in the light of those.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>What you want to do is to have an experiment that normalises just about everything so no matter what the fuel or stove or circumstances, the result is valid. You don’t want a test that is only valid for one particular set of circumstances. For example you would not want to have emissions per kg of fuel because if you used a different fuel, the results are not directly comparable which would obviate the whole point of creating a comparative matrix.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I will circulate some definitions perhaps before the end of this week to kick things off.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Crispin<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> rongretlarson@comcast.net [mailto:rongretlarson@comcast.net] <br><b>Sent:</b> Sunday, April 21, 2013 1:42 PM<br><b>To:</b> Discussion of biomass cooking stoves; Crispin Pemberton-Pigott<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Stoves] Major stove-test proposal<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Crispin - cc Stoves:<br><br> Does your "Toolkit" include a proposal for how one should report the efficiency of char-making in a cookstove?<br><br>Ron<o:p></o:p></span></p><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center id=zwchr></span></div><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>From: </span></b><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>"Crispin Pemberton-Pigott" <<a href="mailto:crispinpigott@gmail.com">crispinpigott@gmail.com</a>><br><b>To: </b>"Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <<a href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a>><br><b>Sent: </b>Sunday, April 21, 2013 11:15:33 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Stoves] Major stove-test proposal<br><br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Dear Paul</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Further to this I can report that there is significant progress on systematising this proposal into the form of a Standard with three sections, or three titles that biomass combusting devices naturally fall into. In fact that could even be refined further by saying that there are three testing approaches that provide comparisons contained in one methodology.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>They are: devices that heat water only (which is so common that they can be specifically tuned for that alone); devices that are used for cooking (they can be controlled enough to give a cook a good cooking experience with enough power and controllability); and comparative testing where an absolute measure is not required, but which tests one stove against another doing exactly the same thing (usually for determining the relative performance of a locally or culturally relevant task). </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The measurements are based on a determination of what constitutes a decent and acceptable cooking experience, which of course varies from region to region. Working back from that, it is possible to set certain targets for performance that are scientifically rooted and defined.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The definitions required are being compiled at this time. A few people have been asked for input and then I will circulate it further. It is very much open for discussion. The Stove Testing Toolbox is a set of agreed methods with their attendant definitions and metrics, each of which exists independently and is valid on its own. At the moment there are two ‘tools’ that seem to be well defined enough to work well.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>One is for determining the heat transfer efficiency of a hot stove at high power and the other is for determining the average heat transfer efficiency over a long burn at one or more power levels including ignition. The latter captures the influence of the thermal mass of a heavy stove – something building into the Chinese National Standard at the moment though it does so in a manner that has not been examined in much detail. Emissions are easily added to the TET numbers based on the mass emitted per net MJ in the pot. Determining the MJ in the pot of a wok or for frying has been a problem. This has been addressed.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The thermal efficiency tests (TET) are similar to the BS, Indian and SeTAR tests meaning they track the heat transferred including the Cp of the pot.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>More details will follow when the documentation is organised.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Regards</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Crispin</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>This was not cross-posted to the biochar list</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>+++++++</span></b><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Stovers and biochar folks.<br><br>The message below and attachment were sent but not distributed (because of too many other recipients).<br><br>That explains why there was so little discussion!! <br><br>I consider this document to be highly important. So here it is, a month late but still to be read.<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><pre>Paul S. Anderson, PhD aka "Dr TLUD"<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Email: <a href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu" target="_blank">psanders@ilstu.edu</a> Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Website: <a href="http://www.drtlud.com" target="_blank">www.drtlud.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre><p class=MsoNormal><br><br>-------- Original Message -------- <o:p></o:p></p><table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0><tr><td nowrap valign=top style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><b>Subject: </b><o:p></o:p></p></td><td style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal>Major stove-test proposal<o:p></o:p></p></td></tr><tr><td nowrap valign=top style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><b>Date: </b><o:p></o:p></p></td><td style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:41:54 -0500<o:p></o:p></p></td></tr><tr><td nowrap valign=top style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><b>From: </b><o:p></o:p></p></td><td style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal>Paul Anderson <a href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu" target="_blank"><psanders@ilstu.edu></a><o:p></o:p></p></td></tr><tr><td nowrap valign=top style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal align=right style='text-align:right'><b>To: </b><o:p></o:p></p></td><td style='padding:0mm 0mm 0mm 0mm'><p class=MsoNormal>Discussion of biomass cooking stoves <a href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org" target="_blank"><stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org></a>, <a href="mailto:biochar@yahoogroups.com" target="_blank">"biochar@yahoogroups.com"</a> <a href="mailto:biochar@yahoogroups.com" target="_blank"><biochar@yahoogroups.com></a>, Hugh McLaughlin <a href="mailto:wastemin1@verizon.net" target="_blank"><wastemin1@verizon.net></a>, Bob Fairchild <a href="mailto:solarbobky@yahoo.com" target="_blank"><solarbobky@yahoo.com></a>, Noeli Anderson <a href="mailto:nvanderson@yahoo.com" target="_blank"><nvanderson@yahoo.com></a>, Doc Anderson <a href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu" target="_blank"><psanders@ilstu.edu></a>, Ranyee Chiang <a href="mailto:rchiang@cleancookstoves.org" target="_blank"><rchiang@cleancookstoves.org></a><o:p></o:p></p></td></tr></table><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></p><pre>Dear All,<o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Here at the GACC Forum, a truly major proposal about adjustments of <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>stove-testing method has been made. It is just beginning to reach <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>those who should be involved. Feel free to forward the attached <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>document to others. And I understand that some additional proposals <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>are being formulated, but I have no details on them.<o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>I will send further comments eventually, but you can start <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>discussions. The conference is very productive. Including some truly <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>meaningful TLUD progress!!!<o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Paul<o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>-- <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Paul S. Anderson, PhD aka "Dr TLUD"<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Email: <a href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu" target="_blank">psanders@ilstu.edu</a> Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Website: <a href="http://www.drtlud.com" target="_blank">www.drtlud.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><pre> <o:p></o:p></pre><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'><br>_______________________________________________<br>Stoves mailing list<br><br>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br><a href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br><br>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page<br><a href="http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org">http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br><br>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:<br><a href="http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/">http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></body></html>