<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Stovers,<br>
<br>
I have recently started to receive Kirk Smith's messages in his
personal [stove] listserv. Note that it is different from the
[Stoves] listserv (capital S and plural s). I wonder what messages
I (and others) have missed in the past. Of course, his focus is on
health issues, which have not been sufficiently addressed in the
Stoves Listserv. Krik, is there an Archive of your previous
messages?<br>
<br>
And who else is on BOTH the [stove] and [Stoves] listserv? <br>
<br>
(to Tom M. and Erin, how can we address this needed linkage? I
think that Dr. Smith is appropriately focused on "health + stoves"
and does not need the full "everything + stoves" that is on the
Stoves Listserv. It is we Stovers who what his "health" element
added into our "everything" medley. )<br>
<br>
I am forwarding Smith's message because it is certainly of interest
to us Stovers. And I add these comments:<br>
<br>
1. The item correctly names coal burning stoves as a problem. But
I will anticipate Crispin's rely by saying that I agree with Crispin
that there are not bad fuels, just bad stoves. And that the
breakthroughs about improved coal burning stoves are just starting
to become known and they need further research. <br>
<br>
2. Remember, there are many different types of coal, so look for
successful clean burning for a specific stove with a specific type
of coal, and celebrate and advocate that success, rather than dwell
upon the NON-successes of other stoves with other types of coal. <br>
<br>
3. The GACC needs to embrace the coal stoves as well as the biomass
stoves and the stoves that use "other" fuels like biogas, LPG,
etc. <br>
<br>
4. Crispin has experience with coal burning stoves in Mongolia.
Some are TLUDs. Claims are that some are quite clean burning.
GETTING THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO ALL OF US SHOULD BE ONE OF THE
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES OF THE GACC AND ACESS. GACC claims to be "stove
neutral". But it is not "stove agnostic". Time for us all the be
more knowledgeable about coal-burning stoves, and the GACC and ACESS
represent us and have access to funding.<br>
<br>
Enjoy Kirk's book review.<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Paul S. Anderson, PhD aka "Dr TLUD"
Email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:psanders@ilstu.edu">psanders@ilstu.edu</a> Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.drtlud.com">www.drtlud.com</a></pre>
<br>
<br>
-------- Original Message --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">Subject:
</th>
<td>[stove] Smoked out: Coal and health</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">Date: </th>
<td>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:03:10 -0700</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">From: </th>
<td>Kirk R. Smith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:krksmith@berkeley.edu"><krksmith@berkeley.edu></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE" align="RIGHT">To: </th>
<td>Kirk R. Smith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Krksmith@berkeley.edu"><Krksmith@berkeley.edu></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
Part of a special issue of Lancet on China's health, June 8,
2013.
Note my emphasis on the household pollution from coal, which was
missed
by the book I reviewed/k<br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part1.02000907.03000504@ilstu.edu" alt="[]"
width="665" height="798">
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>