<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Dan and list:</div><div><br></div><div> 1. This is partly picking up on your ”Is this correct” question below. The answer is yes.</div><div><i><br></i></div><div><i> </i>2. I think you were making your calculations from p 23 of the recommended report, which said:</div><div><br></div><div><div><i>A six-year cycle was recommended to ensure maturity. Harvesting </i></div><div><i>started in 2008 and it emerged that 6-year old acacia trees produce heavier charcoal than 4-year old </i></div><div><i>acacia trees. Under ideal conditions and efficient conversion, it has been estimated that an acre of land </i></div><div><i>should produce about 300 bags (40 kg) of charcoal. </i></div></div><div><br></div><div> Using metric, your 7.3 tons biomass/acre converts to about 7.3*(2/2.2)*2.47 = 16.4 tonnes biomass/ha-yr = 1.64 kg biomass/sqm-yr = 0.8 kg C/sqm-yr (assuming biomass is about half carbon) And these are bone dry tones. Can maybe double for wet tonnes.</div><div><br></div><div> Or, sticking with metric, the harvest is 300 * 40 = 12,000 kg = 12 tonnes char per acre per harvest, or 2 tonnes char /acre-yr. Same as about 5 tonnes char/ha-yr or 4 tonnes C/ha-yr (assuming char is 80% carbon). Using your conversion efficiency of 0.3 (w char to w biomass), this is about 5/.3 = 16.7 tonnes biomass/ha-yr - which is essentially the same that you obtained in English units. But also 30% is awfully good in any kiln. If they were only to get 25% conversion, they would have needed to start with an NPP of 5/.25 = 20 tonnes biomass/ha-yr or about 10 tonnes C/ha-yr = 1 kg C/sqm-yr</div><div><br></div><div> One reason for going through this is to compare to global NPP averages which is about 60 Gt C/yr divided by about 12 Gha = 5 tC/ha-yr. Kenya being twice as large as the global average sounds OK. I’ll bet they can do appreciably better in those parts of Kenya with enough rainfall.</div><div><br></div><div> 3. My main reason, however, for following up is to note that this 2010 study by Practical Action nowhere talks about char-making stoves. It also is full of talk about the illegality of most char making. In the above example, there is mention only of a six year cycle - no pollarding (like coppicing) apparently - chopping down the whole tree every six years? I think they can do a lot more cooking (have faster regrowth of the forests) than with the assumption of producing char with no use of the pyrolysis gases (which are presumably not even flared). So I hope for another study by Practical Action which includes the option of switching from jikos to char-making stoves. That is - moving wood - not char. It was disheartening to read about the illegal taxes that hurt the producers. I wonder if there is also illegal taxing of wood?</div><div><br></div><div> 4. Not really pertinent here, but when I lived in Sudan, the chief forester for the country confessed he was (illegally - prohibitions against introducing exotics) throwing out mesquite seeds at every opportunity. The seeds of the acacia don’t make it through the local animals (goats, etc), but mesquite seeds do. He was pleased with his success.</div><div><br></div><div>Ron</div><br><div><div>On Nov 15, 2013, at 3:03 AM, <a href="mailto:Carefreeland@aol.com">Carefreeland@aol.com</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23536">
<div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;" id="role_body" bottommargin="7" leftmargin="7" rightmargin="7" topmargin="7"><font id="role_document" size="2" face="Arial">
<div>
<div>Teddy, </div>
<div> I have read the article provided and found your
production levels with native acacia to be quite amazing. Correct me if I am
wrong. After doing some math with your numbers, am I
correct? 1 kg = 2.2 lbs, 1 short ton = 2000 lbs. Divide
acerage harvets production number by 6 years to get result. </div>
<div> You are
producing 2.2 short tons per acre/ per year of charcoal. </div>
<div> Reversing the equation. 2.2 tons charcoal at 30%
conversion rate = 7.3 tons of acacia produced per acre, per year, in 6 harvest
cycle. </div>
<div> Is this correct? </div>
<div> Wow. Here in Ohio USA we only figure on
1-2 tons wood per acre, per year, with typical hardwood scrub overgrowth
harvested for fireplace logs maybe every 20- 30 years. </div>
<div> I want to see what happens when we start to coppice
black locust like you do. My question is,will our numbers be as good? </div>
<div> If we use your numbers, a blast furance using 1000
tons of charcoal per day ( to use a round number) would need 165,000 acres
in charcoal production to keep up with demand. Still a lot of acerage to smelt
maybe 1000 tons of iron per day. When that production is first used as building
lumber, and then recycled into fuel, it does not seem so intimidating. In that
case the tranmsportation and harvesting costs are already paid for with the
first life cycle of the wood. </div>
<div> A study done 10 years ago, stated that we burry
1,000,000 tons of wood per year in landfills in only a 3 county area here around
Dayton, Ohio. That wood, converted to charcoal at 30% conversion rate,
would yield 300,000 tons of charcoal per year, Almost the same amount of
production figured above. Some fuel for thought. </div>
<div> Keep up the great work. </div>
<div> </div>
<div> Dan Dimiduk </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" size="2" face="Arial">On Thu,
Nov 14, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Cookswell Jikos <span dir="ltr"><<a title="mailto:cookswelljikos@gmail.com" href="mailto:cookswelljikos@gmail.com" target="_blank">cookswelljikos@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="im">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font face="Arial">OK.... as discouraging as
the facts may be, the facts are reality, and they must be dealt with to
avoid future problems.</font></div>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><font face="Arial">1: Can different species be
grown, that have higher Mean Annual Increments of growth?</font></div></div>
<div><font color="#0000ff" face="Arial">Yes - at least in East African drylands
- the traditional colonial methods of silviculture were focused on high land
pine and cypress plantations not indigenous dry land
adapted trees. (which now provides the feedstock for more of Kenyas
charcoal) Since 1994 we have been experimenting with different dryland
planting and agronomic techniques (please see <a title="http://www.acts.or.ke/dmdocuments/PROJECT_REPORTS/PISCES_Sustainable_Charcoal.pdf" href="http://www.acts.or.ke/dmdocuments/PROJECT_REPORTS/PISCES_Sustainable_Charcoal.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.acts.or.ke/dmdocuments/PROJECT_REPORTS/PISCES_Sustainable_Charcoal.pdf</a> pg.
7) and most of our findings so far have led us to belive that endimic tree
species managed in a holistic and permacutrual manner produce coppiced
'branch' charcoal with an excellent life cycle analysis
profile. </font></div></div></blockquote></font></blockquote></div>
<div></div>
<div> </div></font></div>_______________________________________________<br>Stoves mailing list<br><br>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address<br><a href="mailto:stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org">stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org</a><br><br>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page<br>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org<br><br>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:<br>http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/<br><br></blockquote></div><br></body></html>