<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16545">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Hi All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Thoughts on buoyancy have been grinding around in
my head, and I have had some good ideas for experiments. I have not been
able to work with these because of another situation. I sent
a TLUD with turn-down capability to Aprovecho for testing, but they were
only able to get a turn down ratio of 1.7 to 1. I was able to get 3.3
to1 before I sent it. My assumption is that during shipment some of the
sealant broke off and the stove is leaking too much air into the reactor.
Now I am building a stove which does not require so much sealing by moving the
primary adjustment from the outside directly to the bottom of the reactor.
It is a plate of metal that can cover the bottom of the reactor and can be
pivoted down to allow adjustment of the air flow, thus eliminating several
potential leak points. This is a major redisign and is taking some
time.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>My first thoughts to the responses to my earlier
writing about buoyancy was to be sceptical of what was said. I
could not believe that anything smaller than .01 inches of water column could
drive a fire the size of what I see comming out of our TLUDs. Further
thought. has given me a mechanism which might be able to do this. Pushing
a boulder takes a lot of force. One must overcome both inertia and
friction. If the boulder was made of styrofoam it would take a lot less
force because the lighter material has less inertia and friction with the
ground. The fire gasses are very hot and of VERY low density, so very
little force is required to move them. Also, unlike the boulder, the
friction forces are close to zero. These two things could allow a
tiny push from the air to move the fire gasses, and buoy
them up. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Also I note that as the fire rises, it narrows
and comes to a point, meaning that it is accererating. If the fire could
be kept slower in the combustor, then the combustor could be shorter, thus
possibly getting a better burn with a shorter stove. Dr. Larson has been
talking about making shorter stoves for safety reasons. The down side I
see is that at Aprovecho I learned that heat transfer into the pot is improved
by a fast fire which can penetrate the surface layers of air under the
pot. Slowing the fire down might counter this effect. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Kirk H.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Santa Rosa, CA. USA</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>