<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Paul et al</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Our disagreement in this thread is with people who are convinced stoves shouldn’t be producing charcoal - so I am keeping the stoves list (which you may have intended to drop). They are the ones creating problems for the biochar community (problems including wasting time).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>The list “biochar-international” will have about 1000 papers in 2015 (less than 100 when the term biochar was adopted in 2007). Most of these are on effects in soil. Virtually none on sequestration value - and only a small number on stoves.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>I include the one which has given the largest impact (that I am aware of) on improved productivity. Lots of other references there. Hans-Peter does good work .- and his place of publication is free - with a lot more useful data in this and his other free papers</div></body></html>