<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">List:<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>This following stove article was recommended as I was reading something else. I apologize if it has been mentioned earlier on this list. In skimming it looks pertinent to our recent discussions - and (thank goodness) is free. I don’t propose to fully read and critique it until someone either pans it or praises it. Reason - it doesn’t cover my interests.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>This might be a good time to repeat my favorite stove combination - which somewhat coincides with the LPG preference of this article. It is LPG from renewable biomass sources - IF (repeat <b class=""><u class="">IF</u></b>) the liquid LPG is made locally AND accompanied by a locally produced biochar. I thought Kirk Smith bought into that in a side conversation at the U Iowa stove meeting earlier this year - in part because every country would rather produce than import anything. Many or most countries (with or without stove-health issues_ can make their own bio-LPG. The accompanying biochar should be (and soon will be) supported by climate oriented carbon credits - paid for by folks like we on this list.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>I hope someone can reproduce their work with char-making stoves which would place some points in the 4th (negative ordinate [negative carbon]) quadrant of their important first page figure. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>I also have not given up on future char-making stoves doing much better of the abscissa (health) axis. We already know of TLUDs that perform better than the Phillips stove. But I have no reason to think their data is incorrect. It looks well written. They just didn’t get to my interest areas.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>This 2017 article is at <a href="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.6b05557" class="">http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.6b05557</a></div><div class="">In-Use Emissions and Estimated Impacts of Traditional, Natural- and
Forced-Draft Cookstoves in Rural Malawi </div><div class="">Roshan Wathore,† Kevin Mortimer,‡ and Andrew P. Grieshop</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ron</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>