<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-CA" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoPlainText">I noticed that immediately. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-CA">This helps kill the notion that kerosene is a "dirty fuel". The root of the idea is a claim from a study in India where people use kerosene in a glass tumbler with a cloth wick hanging
out of it, as a lamp. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-CA"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="color:black;mso-fareast-language:EN-CA">Incidentally, the pressure head made by our Stove List reader Sujatha is better than the Indian Roarer Head by some measure. It is not just the stove and the fuel that
can be varied. Sujatha's burner head is the work of her father and it out-performs all competition. It is a carefully balanced piece of work. Installing that head on anyone's pressure stove improves the performance and reduces needed maintenance, and of course
reduces emissions at the same time. How it does that is a secret, but you can still get one for about a dollar.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black">I remind you about the FSP stove from South Africa which has a novel burner that does not involved a standard pressure head. It has extremely low emissions as well.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black"><img width="302" height="342" style="width:3.15in;height:3.5583in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D51FA7.7649DF90" alt="A picture containing floor, table, indoor, next
Description automatically generated"></span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black">Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black">Crispin<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">On 9 Jun 2019 at 12:48, Tom Miles wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">> In contrast, the pressurized kerosene and LPG stoves reduced all
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">> pollutants relative to a traditional three-stone fire (>=93% and<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">> >=79% respectively)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">So, pressurized kerosene was cleaner than LPG?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Neil Taylor<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>