<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Doesn't all the heat used for cooking go into the living space
      anyway (aside from any that gets stored chemically by the cooking
      process)?</p>
    <p>No doubt the difference is relevant for calculating the
      performance of individual parts of the system, but does it make
      any practical difference overall, if cooking is always done when
      there is also a need for space heating?</p>
    <p>But if the stove is ever used for cooking when there is no need
      for space heating, wouldn't the inefficiency arising from that
      fact alone far outweigh the inefficiencies in the "cooking" part
      of the system?</p>
    <p>Similar to what happens when you add a USB electric output to a
      cooking stove, if people then start running the stove purely to
      charge their devices.</p>
    <p>Robert Taylor  <br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 27-May-20 3:30 AM, Ronal Larson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:9DA77698-0D24-4855-9342-FE4C6918D754@comcast.net">
      <blockquote type="cite" class="">
        <div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1;
          caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size:
          12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
          font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align:
          start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space:
          normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
          text-decoration: none;">
          <div class="">
            <div class="">
              <blockquote style="margin-top: 5pt; margin-bottom: 5pt;"
                class="">
                <div class="">
                  <div id="response_container_BBPPID" class="">
                    <div name="BB10" id="BB10_response_div_BBPPID"
                      class="">
                      <div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size:
                        11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"
                        class=""><span style="font-family: Helvetica,
                          sans-serif;" class="">The result is a
                          controllable flame, very much better
                          combustion efficiency, higher temperatures and
                          better CO combustion. The fuel saving is large
                          - maybe 50%. The KG2.5 is about 88+90%
                          efficient (LHV). <o:p class=""></o:p></span></div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt;
                font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span
                  class="apple-tab-span">               <span
                    class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><b
                  class="">[RWL:  Great news.  What portions of that
                  efficiency number for cooking and heating?</b><br
                  class="">
                <br class="">
                <o:p class=""></o:p></div>
              <div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt;
                font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class="">That is the
                heating efficiency.  Cooking comes before the heat
                exchanger so whatever the cooking efficiency is (depends
                on the power setting) that is subtracted from the space
                heating efficiency. </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre">                </span><b
          class="">[RWL:  Surprising that no-one is measuring the
          cooking efficiency number.</b></div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>