<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Julien</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The statement is false because it involves two systems of action. The char, whether in a stove or dumped out, is one system of action and produces at least some CO at some rate. <span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">“Safe” can only be described in terms of a given environment which in this context could be a kitchen. The char emitting CO is a system nested within the kitchen system. Char cannot have the attribute “safe” in this context and attributing “safety”
to char is a synecdoche. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The kitchen could be “safe to occupy” because of the combination of emission rate, volume, air change rate and physical location of an occupant. One can say the occupant is being “exposed” but exposure does not guarantee inhalation because CO
being light, may rise to the ceiling and be inaccessible. <span></span><span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">If safe is defined as an air concentration near the occupant, one can claim it is safe. However that is not something one can say about the char. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">There is a technical report coming from Working Group 1 (of ISO TC 285) which discusses this concept specifically. It is also discussed in the work of WG 4. One cannot say a stove is, by itself, safe unless the context of the kitchen is also
considered. The kitchen is nested within a home, usually, and the home within a neighbourhood and so on. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The nested systems discussion is an attempt to show how to describe risks and benefits appropriately. Like the char CO, people were attributing to a fuel something related to the kitchen, or to the stove as described above. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This is most relevant when discussing the strange manner in which fuels are classified as “clean” or “dirty”. Fuels don’t have such attributes. The device consuming the fuel produces emissions (or not). To find out if using a fuel produces emissions
the product has to be tested burning it. <span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The residual char is nested within a smouldering pile which is nested in a kitchen in a house. So, define “safe”. Is it based on inhaled mass? Exposure time? Concentration? Emission rate? Total mass emitted?</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Opinions differ. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Have fun</div>
<div dir="ltr">Crispin</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Stoves <stoves-bounces@lists.bioenergylists.org> on behalf of Julien Winter <winter.julien@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 21, 2023 4:51:39 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Discussion of biomass cooking stoves <stoves@lists.bioenergylists.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Stoves] Risk of CO poisoning with TLUDs</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Hi All;
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A scientist would say that the statement "all TLUDs have safe emissions of CO from residual char" is a hypothesis in need of experimental falsification. CO should be measured under a variety of conditions (fuels, fuel moisture, primary air rates, etc)
to see if the hypothesis is false. If we can't falsify the hypothesis then we conclude that the hypothesis is "probably" true. If we do find circumstances where CO emissions are hazardous, then we say the TLUD is "probably" safe under these conditions, but
not safe under these other conditions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Scientists are professional skeptics and engineers are professional can-do optimists, so they differ in their training and approach to research.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Julien</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_attr">On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:13 PM Julien Winter <<a href="mailto:winter.julien@gmail.com">winter.julien@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Crispin;
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for your detailed reply.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>From this I would assume that under almost all circumstances, the TLUD is operated with sufficient ventilation to prevent dangerous levels of CO. Nobody operates a TLUD in an enclosed space, because during flame out, there is often a small amount of smoke
released that would be unpleasant if it was not dissipated. Start-ups can also release some smoke. I have not heard of anyone suffering "death by TLUD." <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Sincerely,</div>
<div>Julien.</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_attr">On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:04 AM Julien Winter <<a href="mailto:winter.julien@gmail.com" target="_blank">winter.julien@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Hi All;
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I should mention that I am most concerned with the potential risk when char is not handled efficiently, such as char leaving the TLUD unattended after running the TLUD with the primary air turned down, or dumping the char into a pile without quenching
it.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Julien</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_attr">On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:36 PM Julien Winter <<a href="mailto:winter.julien@gmail.com" target="_blank">winter.julien@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi All;</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Something just occurred to me. If a large amount of char is allowed to accumulate at the bottom of a TLUD, and the primary air flow is low, is there a risk of carbon monoxide poisoning?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Julien<br>
</div>
<br>
<span class="x_gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Julien Winter<br>
Cobourg, ON, CANADA<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
<span class="x_gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Julien Winter<br>
Cobourg, ON, CANADA<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
<span class="x_gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Julien Winter<br>
Cobourg, ON, CANADA<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
<span class="x_gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Julien Winter<br>
Cobourg, ON, CANADA<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>