[Greenbuilding] embodied energy was Polyiso strength on roof

Gennaro Brooks-Church - Eco Brooklyn info at ecobrooklyn.com
Wed Dec 10 15:17:35 CST 2014


Gennaro Brooks-Church
Director, Eco Brooklyn Inc.
Cell: 1 347 244 3016 USA
www.EcoBrooklyn.com
22 2nd St; Brooklyn, NY 11231

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:29 PM, ErgoDesk <ergodesk at gmail.com> wrote:

> When you get all the pieces fitting together you start to realize that EPS
> is an excellent product for Quality and Energy Efficient Buildings. Quality
> Wood will be impossible to fine as a regular construction material so
> alternatives must be found if the industry wants to stay relevant. Watch
> this sequence of a 2 story EPS Composite house being constructed, to better
> understand the process. Mold and Rotting Structural components will be a
> distant past allowing structures to last 100's of year's rather than a few.
> http://goo.gl/bpmmmJ  -george
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
> [image: Inline image 2]
> [image: Inline image 3]
>
>
>
> http://about.me/StyroHome
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Reuben Deumling <9watts at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "However, fiberglass and cellulose are not air barriers."
>>
>> Really? I thought dense pack cellulose was de facto also an air barrier.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, conservation architect <
>> elitalking at rockbridge.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [image: image]
>>> This source from Ergo's link seems pretty authoritative.  I was
>>> disappointed not the see eps on the list.  It does have xps which I expect
>>> to be much higher carbon footprint than eps because of the price.  Still
>>> looking for this comparison. I am surprised that fiberglass is so high.  I
>>> am not surprised that cellulose is so low.  They compared these based on
>>> R20 square foot.  This is fair for conduction performance.  However,
>>> fiberglass and cellulose are not air barriers.  Therefore, the improved
>>> energy performance from this characteristic of the foam products is not
>>> recognized in this evaluation.
>>>
>>> I was impressed by fire video of plaster eps room.  The plaster
>>> installation surely was the major factor in that result. It was still in
>>> place after the fire.
>>>
>>> I can see the potential for eps plaster panels that could lend itself to
>>> reconfiguration and long life.  This is the Lego model.
>>>
>>> Eli
>>>
>>>
>>>  *From:* ErgoDesk <ergodesk at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:05 PM
>>> *To:* Green Building <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Greenbuilding] embodied energy was Polyiso strength on
>>> roof
>>>
>>>  Ok you got me on this one, besides I'm busy trying to save the world,
>>> but if you want to waste time nickel and dimming yourselves on the constant
>>> changing numbers here they are. http://goo.gl/FMnYUz
>>>
>>> -enjoy the info, just warning you upfront
>>>
>>>   http://about.me/StyroHome
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:33 AM, JOHN SALMEN <terrain at shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Except the density thing and the economic  politics that don't set
>>>> recycling requirements for paper in na
>>>> Realistically cellulose insul is like 3%? Of insul  sakes. If that rose
>>>> it would be more forests
>>>>  Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
>>>>    *From: *Alan Abrams
>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 9, 2014 09:35
>>>> *To: *listserv Green Building new
>>>> *Reply To: *Green Building
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [Greenbuilding] embodied energy was Polyiso strength on
>>>> roof
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John...assuming your assessment is accurate, and that any batch of
>>>> cellulose has had at least one go-round as Krauthammer columns, then
>>>> shouldn't the EE value be halved? If so, then it's still high, but more
>>>> competitive against EPS.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>>>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>>>
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>>>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>>>
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>>
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>>
>>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>>
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>>
>>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Greenbuilding mailing list
>> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>>
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>>
>> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20141210/1dbe6a4f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image[1].png
Type: image/png
Size: 81813 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20141210/1dbe6a4f/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gn_30.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 133869 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20141210/1dbe6a4f/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: STYROframe Type Framing System.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 78322 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20141210/1dbe6a4f/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: STYROframe 2-Story.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 107642 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20141210/1dbe6a4f/attachment-0002.jpg>


More information about the Greenbuilding mailing list