[Greenbuilding] PV Tracking
Haudy Kazemi
kaze0010 at umn.edu
Thu Aug 4 06:05:21 CDT 2011
I think this may be playing a role. When most people use the power
output calculators/estimators, they look at the annual production
figures not the daily figures. A tracker in a high latitude may make
larger difference in the summer than in the winter because the arc of
the sun is longer, starting in the northeast and ending in the
northwest. A fixed array in those conditions will self-shade in the
early and late parts of the day. This may the root of the daily
difference between the reported performance difference between the
tracked and non-tracked array.
Roughly speaking, with guesstimate example numbers (actual values could
probably be obtained by digging into an appropriate calculator):
During summer, tracked array may outproduce the non-tracked array by the
~40% reported in this discussion thread.
During spring/fall, tracked array may outproduce non-tracked array by 20%.
During winter, with a short arc, tracked array may outproduce
non-tracked array by 5%.
On an annual basis the tracked array may only exceed the non-tracked
array by ~20%, even it does better than that in the summer.
Perhaps someone can check this in a calculator?
On 8/3/2011 8:00 PM, Nick Pyner wrote:
> I just think nobody is taking the geography in to account.
> There are plenty of PV installations around here, but I have never
> seen or heard of a tracking one. This is probably because there is no
> point in them. The situation could be quite different in the more
> frigid parts of the world for two reasons.
> 1. Even in what is laughably called the banana belt of Canada, the
> insolation is not that great, and the skies are not so clear, so you
> would need to chase every watt you can find.
> 2. In the summer, the days are longer. Hence the practical window of
> opportunity may be as much as an hour wider, but the hourly march of
> the sun is the same.
> A tracking system helps in both cases, and this heathen would imagine
> the more polar you get the more sense a tracker will make.
>
> Nick Pyner
>
> Dee Why NSW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* greenbuilding-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org
> [mailto:greenbuilding-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org]*On Behalf
> Of *RT
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 3 August 2011 2:59 PM
>
> I told him that I had been telling people (this List) that his
> single-axis tracking array had produced 40 and sometimes 44% more
> than the Enphase fixed array and that you (the Listmembers) were
> telling me that I was full of $#!+.
>
> We both just shrugged our shoulders (as if to say "Nyeh! What can
> you do about unbelieving heathens ?")
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20110804/839d3db4/attachment.html>
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list