[Greenbuilding] Carbon and Nitrogen taxes - was drying clothes
sanjay jain
sanjayjainuk at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Sep 1 10:56:16 CDT 2011
Since Nitrogen may be the bigger problem, do we need a Nitrogen tax too? Maybe a sulfur and fluorine tax??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas#Global_warming_potential
Atmospheric lifetime and GWP relative to CO2 at different time horizon for various greenhouse gases.
Gas name
Chemical
formula
Lifetime
(years)
Global warming potential (GWP) for given time horizon
20-yr
100-yr
500-yr
Carbon dioxide CO2 See above 1 1 1
Methane CH4 12 72 25 7.6
Nitrous oxide N2O 114 289 298 153
CFC-12 CCl2F2 100 11 000 10 900 5 200
HCFC-22 CHClF2 12 5 160 1 810 549
Tetrafluoromethane CF4 50 000 5 210 7 390 11 200
Hexafluoroethane C2F6 10 000 8 630 12 200 18 200
Sulphur hexafluoride SF6 3 200 16 300 22 800 32 600
Nitrogen trifluoride NF3 740 12 300 17 200 20 700
________________________________
From: elitalking <elitalking at rockbridge.net>
To: Green Building <greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2011 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] Drying Clothes
Amen to Carbon Tax for simplicity of getting to the
point and getting the non caring to participate in the solution.
Eli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20110901/1c2b9a4e/attachment.html>
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list