[Greenbuilding] So, you think you can top this?

[Richard Garbary]

Typo:

.338 watt hours per day should have been:

338 watt hours per day or .338 kwh/day


=========================================
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Reuben Deumling <9watts at gmail.com> wrote:

> I cannot top this, but there was a time when we (two adults, small
> apartment) used 28 kWh over an equivalent time period. Within shouting
> distance I suppose.
> Alas having since moved into a single family house and having a daughter
> and a home office with two laptops and an internet connection, a chest
> freezer and a basement woodworking shop we're now closer to 100 kWh for
> that amount of time....
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Paul Eldridge <
> paul.eldridge at ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> I've always prided myself on being rather stingy in my use of
>> electricity, but it appears I'm an unrepentant spendthrift compared to past
>> family members.  Whilst rummaging through my grandparent's papers, I came
>> across the power bill linked below (hand written, no less !), dated
>> September 1st, 1948.  It covers a 62-day billing cycle and the total amount
>> consumed is a whopping TWENTY-ONE kWh !
>>
>> See: http://i362.photobucket.com/**albums/oo69/HereinHalifax/**
>> NSP1948Statement.jpg<http://i362.photobucket.com/albums/oo69/HereinHalifax/NSP1948Statement.jpg>
>>
>> This wasteful scoundrel hangs his head in shame.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20121209/564c3bf5/attachment.html>