[Greenbuilding] Brick Veneer over Thick Foam

[ErgoDesk]

How disappointing John, this is a Canadian Company with well heeled
parents. An excerpt fron their Web Site... The *SURETOUCH system* was
developed by Permacon <http://www.permacon.ca/home.html?lang=en>, a
subsidiary of Oldcastle-CRH. For nearly sixty years, Permacon has led the
field in the creation of new masonry finishes and landscaping styles with
its innovative concrete products.

In recognition of this leadership, the parent company (Oldcastle-CRH)
located its North American Research & Development Centre at Permacon in
Montreal. It is therefore here in Canada that all the group’s new products
for the world market are developed. more:
http://suretouch.ca/index.php?page=about-us

Advanced, Super Insulated, Building Systems
http://about.me/ergodesk
https://www.rebelmouse.com/styrohome/




On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:36 PM, RT <archilogic at yahoo.ca> wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:29:00 -0400, Eli Talking <elitalking at rockbridge.net>
> wrote:
>
>   The brick tie should not be required to penetrate all the way through
>> the 3”-6” foam.  My intuitive approach is to treat just like siding by
>> installing furring strips that the brick ties can be mounted to.
>>
>
> While I think that 3-6" of foam outsulation over a wood-framed stud wall
> is going overboard and unnecessarily expensive , different stroke for
> different folks and all.
>
> I don't think that I'd go the brick ties to wood furring strips route.
> (Rotting wood if not treated, rotting hardware (unless all $tainle$$ $teel)
> if using treated wood .
>
> I think that I'd investigate the possibility of setting up a system of
> something like those Tee-shaped steel fence posts either on the outside of
> the foam or embedded in the foam if necessary to which wire brick ties
> could be hooked .
>
> It'd be a matter of devising a means to anchor the tops and bottoms of the
> posts  and doing some number crunching to see if the "posts" would need
> lateral support back to the wood framed wall (perhaps at mid-height) but
> it'd certainly involve few penetrations of the outsulation than a
> conventional brick tie system.
>
> Perhaps the T-bars could also be utilised to deal with the persnickety
> problem of how to anchor the 6 inch foam outsulation to the wood studs as
> well without having to use screws that are so pricey that you think abpout
> getting a pimp to handle them.
>
> I mention the T-bar shape only because I know that they are cheap like
> borscht and strong like bool.
> But perhaps some other shape may prove to be better upon investigation.
> Those hat channel shapes that are used for road signage may be an option
> too ?
>
> Or perhaps the brick veneer itself could be designed to be self-stiffening
> via geometry so that ties become redundant ?
>
> --
> === * ===
> Rob Tom                                 AOD257
> Kanata, Ontario, Canada
>
> < A r c h i L o g i c  at  Y a h o o  dot  c a  >
> (manually winnow the chaff from my edress if you hit "reply")
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Greenbuilding mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.**org <Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org>
>
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.**org/mailman/listinfo/**greenbuilding_lists.*
> *bioenergylists.org<http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20130327/a659f224/attachment.html>