[Greenbuilding] Open Cell Failure
RT
archilogic at yahoo.ca
Thu Jan 30 13:58:35 CST 2014
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:09:28 -0500, conservation architect
<elitalking at rockbridge.net> wrote:
> My statement I believe my statement was incorrect. The high
> concentration of vapor should increase the dew point temperature,
> similar to a high relative humidity. A higher dew point temperature
> increases the vulnerability of condensation and rotting.
I think that the entirety of this thread has been very confused/confusing.
A higher moisture content in the air is by definition, the same as higher
humidity.
It should be obvious then, that for a given temperature, if one increases
the moisture content of that air, one increases the likelihood of
condensation (ie dew point) occurring at the periphery regions where
pockets of still air are likely to created adjacent to cool or cold
surfaces .
Also, even though EPS may be effective as an air barrier material, it's
probably not a good idea to encourage moisture transport via vapour
diffusion into the material even if for no other reason being that its
value as insulation is decreased when it's full of moisture.
The other question is how one gets that moisture back out again once it
has condensed within the EPS.
ie That liquid moisture would need to be turned back into vapour before it
would be cooked out.
Since the EPS is supposedly a thermal insulation which by definition
retards heat transfer, how does one encourage sufficient heat loss from a
heated interior to first turn the condensed moisture in the EPS into
vapour and drive it out into the ventilation air space that Eli wants to
provide on the outside of the insulation and under the roof sheathing ?
A better strategy would seem to be to simply minimise moisture transport
into the EPS in the first place.
Or if the climate is such that one hopes that the condensed moisture in
the EPS will dry to the interior via sun-driven inward vapour drive, is it
really desirable from an healthy indoor air perspective to have stagnant
water that has been hanging around in the dark interstices of the building
materials for who-knows-how-long, dumped into the interior air that the
occupants breathe ? I don't think so.
--
=== * ===
Rob Tom AOD257
Kanata, Ontario, Canada
< A r c h i L o g i c at Y a h o o dot c a >
(manually winnow the chaff from my edress if you hit "reply")
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list