[Greenbuilding] Typos Corrected RE: 2nd try RE: Efficient Solar Panels
Carmine Vasile
gfx-ch at msn.com
Mon Jun 16 14:52:36 CDT 2014
Dear Mr. Bruno: I obviously did make a few typos, which have been corrected in my original email below in red. If you want to re-check my figures, the corresponding SolarCity proposal are @ http://www.gfxtechnology.com/SCP.pdf & http://www.gfxtechnology.com/SCAE.pdf. Regarding your other comment "And if those 24 panels produce 0.266kWh/y x 24 panels (=6.376 kWh/year )", I think a bright fellow like you knows it should have read 0.266 MWH and no I don't "...cover them the other 363 days". Be that as it may, can you recommend a company that leases Solar systems having a guaranteed output of 0.37 MWh/Panel compared to SolarCity's 0.266 MWh/Panel for the 24 panel system shown @ http://www.gfxtechnology.com/SCL.html?Best regards,CarmineDate: Mon, 16 Jun 201 which 4 01:47:54 +0200
From: brunom1 at telenet.be
To: greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org
Subject: Re: [Greenbuilding] 2nd try RE: Efficient Solar Panels
"Complete" version Mr. Vasile ?
For a 'Dr.' your knowledge of electricity seems very poor,
and you are a doctor in electrophysics ? Maybe you're fake, you're just somebody
spoofing the real Dr. Vasile.
Do you understand the difference between kW & kWh ?
and are you not mixing up , and . ?
I cant believe that you need only 10.8kWh a year, for powering
your "whole electric" house,
that would lit one 60 Watt light-bulb only 180 hours.
If that was a typo and if you want 10838 kWh a year from those
ridiculous poorly 0.37kWh/yr panels
you need 29291 of those panels, I've never seen so many panels on
1 house.
And if those 24 panels produce 0.266kWh/y x 24 panels ( =6.376
kWh/year ) they produce only
electricity during 1.08 sunny days; do you cover them the other
363 days?
Maybe try yet again to deliver a 'complete' version but with
realist & right numbers.
And links to the real solar panel provider.( " App note linked to http://gfxtechnology.com/ " is obvious the
wrong link )
In the meanwhile you may like to check this out:
http://watchdog.org/130098/solarcity-horror-stories/
Grts
Bruno M.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carmine Vasile schreef op 12/06/2014 22:37:
The unfinished email
below was sent by mistake. Here's the complete version:
Does anyone know of a
company that leases solar systems with efficient Solar
Panels? The 99%-Solar City system described in the App note
linked to http://gfxtechnology.com/ has
24 panels rated @ 5.88 kW DC (~350 Volts, 16.8 Amps), but
its Annual Production is only 6,376 kWh (0.266 MWh/Panel).
Solar City engineers also
designed a system for our all-electric house that can
produce only 72% of its annual usage: 10,838 kWh; rated @ 11.03 kW DC.
Our utility doesn't allow ground-mounted arrays or use of
our carport, so to attain 99% we need panels capable of
delivering at least 0.37 MWh/Panel.
Any
suggestions?
Best regards,
Dr. Carmine f. Vasile
From: gfx-ch at msn.com
To: greenbuilding at lists.bioenergylists.org
Subject: Efficient Solar Panels
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:12:27 -0400
Does anyone know of a company
that leases solar systems with efficient Solar Panels? The
Solar City system described in the App note linked to http://gfxtechnology.com/
======================================================
_______________________________________________
Greenbuilding mailing list
to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
Greenbuilding at bioenergylists.org
to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/greenbuilding_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20140616/85e61422/attachment.html>
More information about the Greenbuilding
mailing list