[Stoves] [Jatropha cake properties]
Frank Shields
frank at compostlab.com
Mon Jan 24 12:54:05 CST 2011
Dear Crispin, and stovers,
Other experiments using a Spring Tester
http://paceperformance.com/i-6120778-heavy-duty-valve-spring-tester-proform-66775.html
The price is not to bad if we can use the one that only goes to 700 lbs.
But I suggest getting the $800+ one that goes to 1000lbs.
I use the model that goes to 1000 lbs for adobe bricks and now
experimenting with biochar and clay mixtures to determine the amount of
biochar needed to reduce clay turning into a brick. I'm thinking there
may be a way to use the spring tester to test the glueing effect of oil
and other materials on biomass fuel bricks. If we can develop a test
method we can experiment to plot the strength using increasing amounts
of oil (or other materials), change with different temperatures, change
in texture, moisture etc. Using calibrated Spring Testers we can compare
results between labs and set standards down the road. For the adobe
bricks and biochar/clay mixes I use cardboard cylinders (like toilet
paper roll) that I had made that are 1.5" diameter and 1.5" tall.
Perhaps the spring tester of 1000 lbsF could also be used to -make- the
fuel bricks (in addition to testing)? I am sure a screw press goes much
higher, but perhaps the spring tester can simulate what Richard Stanley
is doing(?)
I think we also need the surface area so we can calculate in lbs/sq
inch. If the screw press makes much larger bricks the spring tester may
work if we use it maker smaller diameter bricks(?). And if the screw
press purpose is to extract the oil, is the pressed material left the
bricks? or is the material broken up again and re-pressed into the fuel
bricks of a different shape using a different (less pressure) machine?
After finding what mixes are needed to make the suitable bricks that
will hold up to travel and handling, we need to test the bricks n the
stoves. Finally we will get control over the data so we can move forward
into making better fuel for specific stoves.
Frank
fes
Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote:
> Dear Christa and Paul and Others contributing to this interesting angle
>
> As you may know I have been making oil presses for quite a long time
> and looking at quite a lot of seed cake (‘torteau’ in some countries).
> Cake left alone, when there is a reasonable amount of oil in it,
> hardens as the oil degrades and as the whole thing dries. Old oil
> usually it makes a blackish hard, dry scale on things. In other words
> it is a binder but a slow one. Marula kernel cake is way too valuable
> as a food to burn (presuming you have taken care not to allow
> /fusareum roseum/ to grow on the seeds). Sunflower cake is probably
> like the jatropha cake.
>
> If you have a low(er) pressure press it leaves a fair bit of oil in
> the cake: often 15%, maybe 10% from a screw press, only 6% after
> solvent extraction. The higher numbers are enough to become a binder,
> not a problem, if the post-processing is patient and correct.
> Obviously the fibressness (fibrosity?) of the mix and the amount of
> pure powder and all sorts of physical properties affects the result,
> but in principle, it is not necessarily a negative to have an oily and
> powdery cake.
>
> Perhaps it needs to be compressed gently and heated to accelerate the
> breakdown of something, to dry it, to get something to grip. It may
> need an additive to be the binding fibre, or a chemical that
> accelerates the conversion of an oil to a dry hard goo holding things
> together.
>
> It sounds like the best way to burn the J-cake (J-torteau = Jorteau!)
> is to try combustion systems that do not try to pull air through the
> fuel. An angled downdraft would to (using a wire grate) as would some
> side draft approaches though they would require periodic feeding. My
> bet is downdraft will be best because it removes the ash and provides
> new fuel at a known/fixed place. In that case there would be no air
> pulled through the fuel – i.e. it is loaded into a sealed hopper.
>
> If it is sticky/oily, the hopper should taper slightly larger towards
> the bottom.
>
> If there is an approximate equivalent that is perhaps more accessible
> we could all try versions of ‘cake burners’ that can deal with, say,
> rolled oats and crushed wood pellets and sawdust – that sort of thing.
>
> Regards
>
> Crispin
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Stoves mailing list
>
>to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
>Stoves mailing list
>
>to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site:
>http://www.bioenergylists.org/
>Stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
>http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
>
>
More information about the Stoves
mailing list