[Stoves] Gas heater without flames comment

Ronald Hongsermeier rwhongser at web.de
Mon Jun 30 05:18:34 CDT 2014


Dear Group,
Do you think this is significant enough that several of us should go 
into chicken-farming?

I come from a town that was the center of publishing about Turkey 
Farming for quite a while-- is turkey manure similarly ammonia laden?

regards,

Ronald von Nichthuhnenbürgen


On 30.06.2014 15:55, Michael N Trevor wrote:
> This might have applicability along the line some where
>
> New Chemical Process Could Make Ammonia a Practical Car Fuel
>
> A phys.org article says UK researchers have made a breakthrough that 
> could make ammonia a practical source of hydrogen for fueling cars. 
> From the article: "Many catalysts can effectively crack ammonia to 
> release the hydrogen, but the best ones are very expensive precious 
> metals. This new method is different and involves two simultaneous 
> chemical processes rather than using a catalyst, and can achieve the 
> same result at a fraction of the cost. ... Professor Bill David, who 
> led the STFC research team at the ISIS Neutron Source, said 'Our 
> approach is as effective as the best current catalysts but the active 
> material, sodium amide, costs pennies to produce. We can produce 
> hydrogen from ammonia "on demand" effectively and affordably.'" The 
> full paper. The researchers claim that a two-liter reaction chamber 
> could produce enough hydrogen to power a typical sedan.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: David Young
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:43 AM
> To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
> Subject: Re: [Stoves] Gas heater without flames
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:33:09PM -0400, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote:
>> Keeping an eye on trends:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvqEFPPLh7Q
>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvqEFPPLh7Q&list=PL6ABEE1873667B871>
>> &list=PL6ABEE1873667B871
>
> Neat device.  I take it that one advantage to using a catalyst instead
> of flame combustion is that you can use lower temperatures, and at
> lower temperatures, there are fewer reactions of atmospheric N2 and O2
> producing NOx?
>
> The device seems to use a precious metal, platinum, for a catalyst.
> Perhaps suppose it is a greater problem that the metal is hard to come
> by than expensive, if the amounts are very small.  Is it possible to use
> less expensive catalysts to bring the cost down?  For example, it's my
> understanding that mild steel catalyzes CO combustion.
>
> Dave
>





More information about the Stoves mailing list