[Stoves] Fwd: March 2014 Update

[kgharris]

Ronald H,



I for one disagree with your thoughts on many levels. Perhaps one day you will grow to a level of understanding that will be beneficial to the world. Dr. Larson, I and the rest of us look forward to your arrival. Hope you don't mind if we don't wait for you, we have much to do.



Kirk Harris


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ronald Hongsermeier 
  To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves 
  Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 1:13 AM
  Subject: Re: [Stoves] Fwd: March 2014 Update


  CAUTION: sarcasm alert!
  yup, all you have to do is convince UNO that that value is high enough and they'll send blue-helmets all over the world to make people dismantle their homes at gunpoint: then burn them one stick at a time in TLUD's so the resulting char can be sequestered.
  If you lived in Californina, Ronal, you'd have voted for Senator Yee.

  Ronald von Livingineuropewithoutacesealonmyforehead


  On 28.03.2014 04:35, Ronal W. Larson wrote:

    Jock etal


    I am afraid we have not done as good a job as we could on any part of char-making stove promotion.  They also don't say anything about CDR = Carbon dioxide removal.   They'll get there eventually.  


    To others:    Jock is referring to a part of the message I forwarded earlier today from the Director of GACC.  I changed the font coloring, in case this comes through as unreadable as Jock's version.


    Ron


                    to save lives, improve livelihoods, empower women, and protect the environment by creating a thriving global market for clean and efficient household cooking solutions.
                   
             







    On Mar 27, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Jock Gill <jg45 at icloud.com> wrote:


      Ron,


      No where in the mission statement


                    to save lives, improve livelihoods, empower women, and protect the environment by creating a thriving global market for clean and efficient household cooking solutions.
                   
             



      does it mention improving agricultural yields and quality.  If this is not in the mission statement, why should we expect this benefit to be a key metric in the standards they promote?


      Not including the agricultural and economic benefits of biochar in their overall vision means that pyrolytic stoves have to compete with simple combustion devices with at least one hand tied behind the back.  Not at all a level playing field.


      Thoughts,


      Jock




      Jock Gill
      P.O. Box 3
      Peacham,  VT 05862


      Cell: (617) 449-8111


      google.com/+JockGill


      :> Extract CO2 from the atmosphere! <:


      Via iPad

      On Mar 27, 2014, at 6:21 PM, "Ronal W. Larson" <rongretlarson at comcast.net> wrote:


        to save lives, improve livelihoods, empower women, and protect the environment by creating a thriving global market for clean and efficient household cooking solutions.


     

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Stoves mailing list

  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
  stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org

  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
  http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

  for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
  http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20140328/67323eaf/attachment.html>