[Stoves] FW: health impact?

Inversiones Falcon invfalcones53 at yahoo.com
Sat Sep 6 09:56:49 CDT 2014


Dear Erin, safety is one of my priorities when designing stoves, I send some pictures of the stove models sell more and one of the reasons for our success in sales is safety. and also let me let you all know that Paul Anderson is comming to El Salvador next week to attend a Foro about the use of wood in our countri, he will have a speach obout micro gasification, and will present a charcoal maker divice.

see pictures of my stove with safety future. the yellow mesh and the galvanized sheet is to protec from burn and radiation while people use the stove. the combustion chamber is a rocket that I test last year in Guatemala with some peoplo of Aprovecho. I have one round stove 50 cm diameter and another one you can see in this pictures 50 x 70 cm with burners on top of the plate.

 

Best regard 

 

Gus

 

On Thursday, September 4, 2014 11:13 AM, Erin Rasmussen <erin at trmiles.com> wrote:

 

It's surprising to me that there is no calculation of overall stove safety in these studies of health benefits.  Reducing emissions is important, but preventing burns and fires is also critically important to stove use and performance.  

 

I wonder if there is a way to adjust our metrics to account for some of the 'basics': building stoves with safety features; preventing skirt fires; preventing scalding and severe burns to arms and legs and fingers and toes (and faces).  Disfigurement may be fatal in some areas, but even when it's not it's bound to have non-trivial life-long  impacts. 

 

Erin Rasmussen

erin at trmiles.com 

 

From: Stoves [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org] On Behalf Of Sumi Mehta
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:15 AM
To: stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org
Cc: Radha Muthiah; Ajay Pillarisetti; Ranyee Chiang; Kirk R. Smith
Subject: [Stoves] FW: health impact?

 

Thanks, Marc-Antoine,  for your keen interest in ensuring the health benefits of adopting clean cooking technologies.  As you can imagine, this is of very high priority here at the Alliance.  Our aim is to ensure the promotion of cleaner cooking technologies, i.e. the cleanest possible technologies accessible and available for different customer segments.  In addition, since the long term goal is universal adoption of truly ‘clean’ cooking, we are committed and working with partners to ensure that the cleanest possible technologies are developed for all fuels currently in use.  
We are also committed to ensuring that people can shift to cleaner and cleaner technologies and fuels, by working with a wide range of our partners to facilitate increased access and affordability.  
 
As you are aware, there is even a wide variability of performance associated with the range of rocket stoves available.  Indeed, HAPIT offers different performance  scenarios to reflect the range of options in the market (as well as aspirational performance), and the Alliance’s work will strive to cover the range of options available.  In any case, I will leave it to Kirk and his team to reply about the HAPIT-specific questions in more detail....   
 
Regards,

 

Sumi

 

Sumi Mehta, MPH, PhD
Director of Research and Evaluation
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 300
Washington DC 20006
tel: +1 202-787-5642 
 <mailto:smehta at cleancookstoves.org> smehta at cleancookstoves.org
 <http://www.cleancookstoves.org/> www.cleancookstoves.org

 

 

From: Marc-Antoine Pare <marcpare0 at gmail.com>

Date: September 3, 2014, 2:57:50 AM EDT

To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves < stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org <mailto:stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org> >

Subject: [Stoves] health impact?

Reply-To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves < stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org <mailto:stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org> >

Hi everyone,

 

A big confession: having tinkered with stoves for years, I never actually looked into the numbers of stove health impacts. I'm trying to fix that, and I hope you can help!

 

I mean, yes, I can wave my hands about PM and CO and four million deaths!

 

But how many deaths (or DALYs) do you avert per stove? Or per 10,000 stoves? Or per 100,000,000?

 

I thought it would be an easy question to answer, but it's turning out to be quite tricky to even ballpark.

 

Here is one interesting source. This is from the very recent webinar on Kirk Smith's HAPIT tool. 

 

http://www.cleancookstoves.org/resources_files/hapit-results-rwanda.pdf 

 

This report considers 25,000 households.

If you provide all of those households a rocket stove, you save only 0.75 lives per year.

 

If you take the GACC's target 100,000,000 households, that would mean

 

0.75/25000*100000000 = 3,000 lives saved worldwide annually.

 

What am I missing there? This seems so small.

 

Some speculation:

 

Kirk Smith mentions in the HAPIT webinar that even a small amount of PM2.5 is still harmful. Perhaps biomass stoves just don't get the number low enough?

 

I think this would fit with the chart in the linked PDF that shows that stoves only reduce deaths by <5% for indoor air pollution. A few times in the HAPIT webinar, they mention "a lot of lives are still left on the table."

 

This also seems to agree with something I found in Christian L'Orange's dissertation:

http://digitool.library.colostate.edu///exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS8yNDYyOTQ=.pdf <http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/exlibris/dtl/d3_1/apache_media/L2V4bGlicmlzL2R0bC9kM18xL2FwYWNoZV9tZWRpYS8yNDYyOTQ=.pdf>  

 

Figure 33 shows that Envirofit G3300 stoves only have a 3% (or so) impact on "Adjusted Relative Risk" (of death)

 

 

Please do not worry about hurting my feelings in correcting these numbers. Am I thinking about this the wrong way around? Have I punched the numbers in incorrectly? 

 

Also, I would be very interested to read more good papers on health impacts for stoves. It is all really quite interesting work. I feel bad that I didn't look at it sooner.

 

Best,

Marc Paré

_______________________________________________

Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address

stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page

http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:

http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/


_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20140906/f50dc573/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 09 06 14 Save Stoves Inversiones Falcon.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 272275 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20140906/f50dc573/attachment.pdf>


More information about the Stoves mailing list