[Stoves] Advocacy action: ask the GACC to stop promoting the WBT

[Xavier Brandao]

Dear Ron,

I don't know what reliability exactly is, but that:

"The results indicate that at 90%, 95% and 99% degree of confidence, 
only 22.22%, 15.00% and 15.00% of all the supposed ‘‘improved” stoves 
emerged respectively as real ICSs at most, while the percentage of 
‘‘improved” stoves obtained by considering the mean values of the WBT is 
among 3 and 6 times higher than the percentage resulted by taking into 
account the epistemic uncertainties."

is unreliability.

Best,

Xavier


On 1/27/17 01:37, Ronal W. Larson wrote:
> Xavier et al:
>
> 	Can you define, quantitatively,  the term “reliability”?  Where is the dividing line - for different topics?
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20170127/7e52f5e5/attachment.html>