[Stoves] Calculating cooking costs and char costs ----Re: [biochar] Where to discuss STOVES AND CARBON offsets and drawdown

[Nikhil Desai]

Frans:

Subsidies for dung are not new. Biogas, for instance.

Another way is to threaten taxes or give tax exemptions for investments in
improved manure management. Back 20+ years ago I remember calculations on
the economics of pig and chicken waste management in US and China. More
than manure; the food industry generates huge quantities of organic wastes
in need of proper handling.

Alas, I have no technical solutions for some intellectual wastes.

Nikhil


On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Frans Peeters <peetersfrans at telenet.be>
wrote:

> Nikhil,
>
>
>
> Very good ! SUBSIDIES for dunge !
>
>
>
>    Here we sell  bukets with dry cow dunge fertiliser !    For ladies
> their AZALEAS .
>
> If you sell  HOLLY COW DUNG ……it must be stil better business !
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> F.
>
>
>
> *Van:* Stoves [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org] *Namens *Nikhil
> Desai
> *Verzonden:* dinsdag 19 september 2017 20:23
> *Aan:* Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [Stoves] Calculating cooking costs and char costs
> ----Re: [biochar] Where to discuss STOVES AND CARBON offsets and drawdown
>
>
>
> Crispin:
>
> Thank you for pointing out market signals due to fertilizer subsidies.
> Very interesting.
>
> China also must have a great deal of animal waste from the food industry -
> couldn't that go to fertilizer and climate char?
>
>
>
> CDM and GS computations are driven by theories that have not been
> validated in practice.  Invent a theory that can win a nod by opaque
> methods signed off by a technical advisory council stacked by pals, and
> gold taps will open.
>
> Nikhil
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20170921/26ced8bc/attachment.html>