[Stoves] Distillation and oxidation Re: Understanding TLUDs, MPF and more. (was Re: Bangladesh TLUD )
Paul Anderson
psanders at ilstu.edu
Sun Jan 7 08:05:40 CST 2018
Some clarification,
1. This message is to the Stoves Listserv. There have been perhaps 20
other messages with the exact same Subject title that have gone to only
3 to 5 people, even with the RE:[Stoves] start to the title. There
were some good exchanges and I learned so infom but (in my opinion)
_most_ Stovers should be glad that they were spared from reading those
messages.
2. The topic is actually of more potential interest to those who are
keen about Gasification (broadest definition). And those readers are
on their own listserv, of which I have been a subscriber since about
2001-02. That Gasification List has shown MINIMAL interest in the
topic of TLUD stoves and other micro-gasification devices, and I almost
totally agree with them about that Gasification Listserve to be dealing
with larger systems, not stoves. So the dialog about TLUDs etc has
been on the Stoves LIstserv.
3. I will NOT be posting this discussion of distillation and oxidation
to the Gasification Listserv. But on that list are the experts about
pyrolysis and gasification and all the related processes. Tom Miles is
on both listservs but did not direct the past messages to that group.
The Gasification group can also be very good at "verbal wars" and
"definitions" debates.
4. Crispin has written one thing that I do need to address. He wrote:
> I see now that the two different approaches described by Hirendra will probably give different results:
It has been acknowledged that Hirendra is a gasification expert (in his
80s) who had not heard for TLUD stoves prior to Crispin bringing him in
as a expert. I suspect that MANY true experts on the formal and
longstanding science of gasification have not heard of TLUD or other
micro-gasifier devices, and have not studied them. That is fine, but
does not mean that their comments are correct about gasification topics
that are new to them. The next sentence is NOT correct, whether stated
by Hirendra or Crispin:
> the TLUD with a glowing bed through which the distilled gases immediately under it have to pass in one type,
How are there distilled gases (pyrolytic gases, combustible gases) ever
getting to be UNDER the the glowing bed, even if "immediately under"
means a millimeter or less. It is possible that some of the gases that
are coming out of a pyrolyzing piece of biomass could be exiting
downward, which would be directly into the glowing bed (or any very thin
layer that is glowing red hot.) Expect those gases to be combusted IF
there is sufficient primary air reaching that area. If surplus gases
are there, they would move upward, NOT THROUGH ANY GLOWING BED.
Also consider the pyrolytic gases coming out of the upper side of the
pieces of biomass. There is no glowing area at all on that side, and
the gases move awary from the glowing hot zone that is beneath the
pieces of biomass.
The pyrolytic ("destructively dry distilled") combustible gases that
move upward inside a TLUD stove are tarry, smoky, long-chain hydrocarbons.
I thank Andrew and Alex for their comments and clarifications, some of
which are found below.
Paul
Doc / Dr TLUD / Prof. Paul S. Anderson, PhD
Email: psanders at ilstu.edu
Skype: paultlud Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website: www.drtlud.com
On 1/7/2018 5:27 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote:
> Dear Andrew
>
> I have been looking into the combustion of hydrogen and I think the idea that hydrogen does not make water vapour in a small gasifier at all is not going to hold up. Let's keep looking.
>
> According to the hydrogen promoting guys the ignition energy is SO LOW just about anything will make it react. In other words the gas doesn't have to reach 570 C to auto-ignite. It will accept any input above 0.05 MJ.
>
> The TLUD experiments from Julien report temperatures above 600 and I suspect the thermocouples are all under-reporting.
>
> I see now that the two different approaches described by Hirendra will probably give different results: the TLUD with a glowing bed through which the distilled gases immediately under it have to pass in one type, and the continuous updraft where the oxidation layer is always under the distillation zone is the other. In the latter case the hydrogen will not pass through a 'fire' in any sense and if it remains under 570 it will not auto-ignite.
>
> Some gasifiers are run up to 1100 C so I am not including them. Just the ones we have been calling 'pyrolysers' for some reason that is not nearly as clear now that we have discussed it more.
>
> Back in the land of real and small gasifiers, the reactions in the little TLUD's take place in the presence of air so the availability of oxygen is not the limitation, right? At the moment, from what I have read, that if I fed hydrogen into the primary air supply of a TLUD it would all emerge in the gas stream above. If you try it, stand well back.
>
> Regards
> Crispin
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7 January 2018 at 02:31, alex english <aenglish444 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Destructive distillation of wood was the term back in the 1930s when my
>> grandfather wrote a high school text book.
>> Attached;
>> is a slide on pyrolysis stages from our national labs senior scientist
>> responsible for bioenergy and the tar sands pyrolysis.
>> and two images of google word use search between 1800-2000 for pyrolysis and
>> destructive distillation.
>
> Good graphs of the change in terminology from destructive distillation
> toward pyrolysis. I knew the term but considered it more to do with
> the making of simple organic compounds from wood before organic
> chemistry really took off with the petrochemical industry.
>
> The wood gas distillation produced acetic acid and methanol amongst
> many other chemicals. I have posted in the past about an acetic acid
> plant in Germany which pyrolysed beech logs, distilled vinegar and
> used the other gasous products in a spark ignition engine to power the
> plant. charcoal was a less valuable by product.
>
> There have been a flurry of offlist e-mails which I have replied to
> without realising they will not be seen on stoves.
>
> Anyway your slide clearly shows agreement with what Tom Reed said all
> those years ago, there is an exothermic stage and here the range is
> given a bit wider as 280-500C but the salient point is that the oxygen
> bearing compounds given off do not include water beyond the drying
> phase. So in the final stages the gases CO and H2 are favoured as I
> have said earlier.
>
> Whilst acknowledging there may be a means for disociating all the
> elements in wood and recombining the oxygen with the hydrogen it does
> not happen in simple stoves or gasification.
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180107/14e12e38/attachment.html>
More information about the Stoves
mailing list