[Stoves] WBT disagrements

[Xavier Brandao]

Dear Andrew,

 

"I read it to the first significant typo and wondered who had proof

read it amongst the peers before I skimmed the rest."

What do you mean by that?

 

Are you talking about the paper "Systematic and conceptual errors in
standards and protocols for 

thermal performance of biomass stoves"?

 

I have read it, and didn't find typos. But I’m not a native English speaker.

 

What was the typo? Did you only skim read the paper? What did you think of
it?

 

Best,

 

Xavier

 

 

 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Stoves [mailto:stoves-bounces at lists.bioenergylists.org] De la part de
Andrew Heggie
Envoyé : dimanche 14 janvier 2018 23:31
À : Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
Objet : Re: [Stoves] WBT disagrements

 

On 14 January 2018 at 22:56,  <tmiles at trmiles.com> wrote:

> 

> In the US it often takes three peer reviewed papers just to start the

> conversation with agencies. Replication by different people seems to be
the

> trend. This paper is a good start.

 

I read it to the first significant typo and wondered who had proof

read it amongst the peers before I skimmed the rest.

 

Andrew

 

_______________________________________________

Stoves mailing list

 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address

stoves at lists.bioenergylists.org

 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page

http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists
.org

 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:

http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/



---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180116/c6bde995/attachment.html>