[Stoves] Interesting Video

Wed Mar 28 09:03:08 CDT 2018

Dear Philip

Thank you for pointing out the source material and the correction of the Nature opinion tossing.

Also thank you for taking over the organisation of the Domestic Use of Energy conference coming next week. Your services are invaluable.

Best regards
Crispin

The science reported is sound – it summarizes the effects of extra CO2 on hundreds of species, doing nothing more than quoting published studies.  The Nature article is a common-or-garden hatchet job worrying about the editorial material in CO2 science.

Prof Philip Lloyd
Energy Institute, CPUT
PO Box 1906
Bellville 7535
Tel 021 959 4323
Cell 083 441 5247
PA Nadia 021 959 4330

CO2 Science is a very controversial source for CO2 science.

http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2008/08/more_for_the_annals_of_climate_1.html<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.nature.com%2Fclimatefeedback%2F2008%2F08%2Fmore_for_the_annals_of_climate_1.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0d815f22bb404410aa5708d594b4470b%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636578424357552345&sdata=scbQsQ7bRe%2FwNOA7RWDRHapTLdg7vgqVvry7VyMFMHA%3D&reserved=0>

Gordon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bioenergylists.org/pipermail/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org/attachments/20180328/a70da31a/attachment.html>