[Gasification] Syngas, why not just fix it?
tombreed2010 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 17:49:14 CST 2011
Dear Pete and all
I'llrepeat the composition of "standard producer gas" to get it on the books. H2,19; CO, 21; CH4 5; N2 52; misc 3 volume % dry basis. I have been dealing with PG for 40 years, and it doesn't vary much from this provided the fuel has < 20% H2O.
You can find lots more information in our books at www.WoodGas.com
Dr Thomas B Reed
President, The Biomass Energy Foundation
On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Pete&Sheri <spaco at baldwin-telecom.net> wrote:
> This topic sure has taken up a lot of time. Why not just fix it if y'all don't like it the way it is?
> Earlier I suggested that the analysis of this mystery gas might fit into some numbering system, as is done with steel.
> It seems to me that this group is the right one to do it.
> One could at least deal with the top half dozen components, couldn't one?
> Again, back to the steel analogy--- we don't have any problems talking about A36, 1018, W1, etc..
> Maybe, a letter for the top component?
> Maybe a 2 tier system,; one for those gases with N2 and one for those without?
> Maybe someone could at least tell me why this shouldn't be done now?
> Pete Stanaitis
> Gasification mailing list
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> Gasification at bioenergylists.org
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> for more Gasifiers, News and Information see our web site:
More information about the Gasification